MistyWaters
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Feb 2, 2017
- Messages
- 12,003
- Reaction score
- 67,203
BBM - I think they looked back and saw they received multiple tips related to the same person/vehicle and for some reason dismissed it. I’m not saying an avalanche, but definitely more than one. I think LE has someone they are looking at hard.
The article references a vehicle so I don’t think getting around quickly is in reference to the events at the trail unless they are thinking he picked them up either under the bridge or somewhere else near the trail.
How could they determine he got around quickly the day the girls were killed if they don’t know who he is. How would you determine an unknown person’s mobility? I’m sleepy today and not sure if I make sense.
I suppose a conclusion could also be drawn that the murderer was familiar with the area and knew how to get around quickly because he was not sighted anywhere on the trail during times when others should’ve seen him. I do not recall LE ever stating a suspect was observed by others on the trail system immediately before or after murders occurred. If so, that could be a reason for the next best focus, the first a sketch of a man reportedly sighted near the trails. Sketch #2, the time, day or location of the sighting hasn’t been released.