Charlot123
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jul 29, 2018
- Messages
- 8,346
- Reaction score
- 56,495
I have seen this before but watched it again from this 49 minute mark to the end. When someone arrested was brought up, whose name we have all heard before, he said that they have no evidence to include or exclude him--this almost sounds as if there is no DNA... If they did, could he not be included or excluded?
Jmo.
JMO
I can imagine that they could have not sorted out all the DNAs from the crime scene, initially.
Abby was wearing Kelsi's (or someone's from Libby's house) coat. A very sad circumstance, given the case. It was from Patty's home - it had DNA from all of them, and then some, probably. It might take a long time to sort out all DNAs.
Another issue is, whose DNAs did BG leave at the place of the crime? Was the coat his? Did he "borrow" it from his friend? Family?
But, I hope BG left his own DNA there, too. And I think that FBI and now, private companies, have found the way, the algorithm to sort out the DNAs from crime places, what comes from whom.
(BTW - I think that BF could not afford the luxury of shaving his head to prevent leaving DNA as it would have been noticed by people around him. But he could have covered his lower face with a scarf, or a nylon stocking, or some synthetic thing preventing shedding of DNA).
Nonetheless, I think he still might have left some of his own, and hope that now it has become available.