No Contact Restraining/Protective Orders are different that a Judge stating that a condition of a Bond is that FD is to have no contact with the Victim's Family. In the former, messages relayed through a third party would be seen as a violation of the restraining order. I do not believe the latter is the same, at least to the same punishable/re-arrest level. JMO from experience working in DV field.
And this next part is just my overactive brain that stayed up too late and has seen too much and is overwhelmed by the circus NP is creating.
Another item I found interesting was NP's statement that "Norm Pattis said Fotis Dulos is willing to waive his fifth amendment right and speak with the state’s attorney about Jennifer’s state of mind before her disappearance.
@News12CT" if the just would allow for FD to speak about eval.
The 5th amendment right = protects individuals from being forced to incriminate themselves.
So absolutely ridiculous thought here, but hey if NP is going to go with revenge suicide/gone girl, maybe they are committing and going to try and say, "Yeah, FD has been stalking JD since Wednesday. He was concerned that JD was going to not allow him to have the kids as court ordered for the weekend, because ***Insert any of the BS crap that NP is spewing about JD that I refuse to type/repeat***. He then saw JD acting suspicious, she drove her car to Waveny, then ran back to house and harmed herself in garage. FD approached her and tried to help/save her to no avail. Panicked FD, knowing he would be charged with her death, cleaned up the garage and fled to Farmington. He then packed everything up in Ziplock sized garbage bags, hence the 30 bags, and enlisted the love of his life, MT, who we must add, he misses dearly and would really appreciate being allowed to see since he is now cooperating with the state, to get rid of the bags on Albany Ave"