Theatre....And all the world is FW's stage...For now...JMO
Jmo was James Manley’s charges dismissed with prejudice or without?
It was without. Junk said he may take JM's Case before the Grand Jury at a later date and see if they indict him. We don't know if he did later go to the GJ and they didn't indict him, or if he just never took it to the GJ again. It's been 2 years, the odds of James getting indicted again are nil in my opinion.
I find it very curious that the reason Junk gave for dismissing James Manley's case is that the prosecution did not want to reveal the reasons for the GPS Warrant because it could comprise the murder investigation.
It's curious because Owen, Fred's attorney, asked for the Search Warrant Affidavits (reasons listed why they need the search) of Fred's property and Junk said they couldn't reveal that information because it could compromise the Wagner 4 murder trials. So Owen never got this Discovery request that the Defense was very much entitled to!
So is this the real reason for the Dismissal yesterday? I think it at least added to the
reason for the Dismissal.
........Just My 2 Cents........
In my opinion, the dismissal is due to continued review of what FW provided in her receipts and the speedy trial clock.
If her submitted receipts led to new stuff to be looked into, including IP addresses, it makes me wonder even more about the items in those receipts:
2x bullet proof vest, a second BPV, 4x fringed and flashy coat, slingshot, and a helmet
I have always found the 4x jacket to be an odd one after looking at the style. It doesn't look like one I picture BW wearing, based on what photos I have seen, and while he is a larger man, I could see 2x such as the BPV more so than the 4x.
There could be something to the inclusion of that jacket, the slingshot, and /or helmet in the receipts. Maybe the ip addresses could show one or more of these items were purchased from a different IP address which would demonstrate her account is used to make purchases by others.
Anyhow, just an opinion or initial reaction to what I felt I heard/read in yesterday's news. The items bundled together in the receipts provided seemed strange to begin with.
Thankx for the article Ann!Good article that explains Prosecution possible reasoning for the dismissal.
Hoping Manley, Rhoden and Gilley Families find this strategy comforting, giving confidence in AC and her use of trial strategy.
Can’t cut and paste from the article, so a must read.
JMO, Much more has been learned by LE regarding the purchases and the actual buyer.
Again, JMO...
RSBM
...All of the other victims were out of sight from the front door and front windows as far as we know. ... potentially could have given the killers more time when it came to the victims being found.
What would have happened had BJM not went in Sr’s house that morning? How long would it have taken for anyone to discover all 8 victims? ... So, it was only a matter of time before the victims were found but still all of the doors were locked. ... Had she not unlocked Chris’ door, more time would’ve passed before discovery. ...
Thanks CoolCats!
Apparently I was wrong about Fred. The charges have been dismissed against her. While I will not go so far as to say she is innocent, at this time the only thing she has been proven guilty of is wearing a snood to court and having the most fantastic complexion I have ever seen on a 76 year old woman. We should all be so lucky at 76.Jmo but she was only being used for pressure and the state had to threaten more charges to try to keep some type of pressure on. The prosecutor knew they couldn’t go to trial and end with an innocent verdict. Jmo
@Cool Cats
Thankx @RAISINISBACK . I apologize for over-reacting to your post a few days ago. My sister passed and I'm so stressed trying to pay everything and distribute everything fairly as executor of her estate ("I want her grill", "I want her jewelry", "a pipe burst in her house fix it "Cool Cats!", " her mortgage payment is due" "you need to pay it "Cool Cats!" " You better pay it!!! ETC"...) She was divorced with no kids and I'm her only sibling. I was just too emotional to even be posting, the thread isn't about me! I like your posts and look forward to many more posts from you and all the other posters on here.
Justice is coming!.....Sorry, don't want to make the thread about what I'm dealing with. I, we, all of us, just want to see it through and look, wait , and hope, for Justice!
I too have that impression.That's an interesting and plausible theory. I've had the impression all along that the prosecution has some significant evidence that they didn't want to reveal in these pre-trial hearings for FW and RN. Recordings of conversations? Something that bolsters the cases re collusion and pattern of corrupt activity?
That said, its still possible there was something in the discovery the state received from FW's defense that helped bolster their case. I don't see AC making up a story like that when she could be called on it later. Would she?
ETA: I do think RN will go to trial and probably be convicted on her forgery charges. State needs solid evidence for that and assume they have it.
JMO
Charges dismissed against Fredericka Wagner in Pike County massacre case - cleveland.comHere is your link
Charges dismissed against Fredericka Wagner in Pike County massacre case
Yes, the Plain Dealer almost sounds like they want the other defendants to get out of jail, too. What an odd newspaper. They've always been terrible. JMO
I have always said that she is not the one who bought that stuff on her account.I think your right, I believe when FW let the prosecution have access to her internet server over her case, that is when LE found a lot more against the Wagners 4
According to the Memorandum, prosecutors claim Fredericka Wagner told a Grand Jury “repeatedly… that she purchased the items on Amazon, that she had already printed out the records, and that she would provide them to the state.” However, prosecutors later claimed “the defense has arguably engaged in dilatory practices.’