gitana1
Verified Attorney
- Joined
- May 31, 2005
- Messages
- 29,359
- Reaction score
- 229,674
I've been lurking in this thread since this trial started. Finally decided to create an account and jump in. So Hi!
This thread offers more insightful commentary than the talking heads over at CourtTV and Law and Crime. So big props to all of you in here. Really engaging discussion.
Anyway, now that all the evidence is in, I feel like state is standing on much stronger ground than when they started. The cross exam of the two expert defense witnesses by Kraft were a knock out imo. The way she brought up nanoticide especially today was DEFT! I think the psych expert's assessment about BSR is not far off - I just don't agree with his claim that she was coerced or influenced into giving false statements in that interview. I agree that lighting the baby on fire doesn't make sense - but I'm not going to discard all the other admissions she made just because of that one "admission." I think some folks and the defense want to bank on the jury throwing out her confession in its entirety based on that one "extreme" statement. Jury will be instructed that they can choose what to believe and what not to believe. They're not required to throw out a whole confession because of a couple nonsensical statements.
I think both interviews are damaging to the defense and they know it, hence why we spent most of today with useless "character witnesses."
<------ This is an excellent analysis! I think even though defense, wisely, didn't want the jury to get the FULL assessment, the jury will put 2 and 2 together. Because the texts between Skylar and her mother make clear to me that Kim knew her daughter was pregnant and tacitly encouraged Skylar's subsequent actions.
Welcome to websleuths!!