AnnieOakley
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Nov 9, 2007
- Messages
- 718
- Reaction score
- 637
I don't mean to add to the confusion here, but I read the quote above as the remains themselves were originally thought to be six years old, and not from a six year old.
Thank you. Yes I meant the remains could have been there for 6 years, making the timeline between Suzanne's disappearance and the discovery of the remains a reasonable one.