Wyle_E_Coyote
Northern Virginia
- Joined
- Dec 26, 2011
- Messages
- 4,109
- Reaction score
- 7,776
I'm not sure i understand. The 50k was raised for the Papinis.Have you got a source for that? Or is it just inference since the gofuundme made that much?
I'm not sure i understand. The 50k was raised for the Papinis.Have you got a source for that? Or is it just inference since the gofuundme made that much?
I'm not sure i understand. The 50k was raised for the Papinis.
Fundraiser for Suzanne Papini by Keith Papini : Help Find Sherri Papini
Help Find Sherri Papini
$49,070 raised
The first two comments by a CRB, CS, and a LA are interesting.
I agree with a commenter at the link that the $$ should be given to law enforcement who spent time and funds to find her.
Abducted jogger skips town with family and leaves dogs behind http://nypost.com/2016/12/05/abducted-jogger-skips-town-with-family-and-leaves-dogs-behind/
We can't link the GoGimmeMoney on this site. It's easily found with a Google search of "Sherri Papini GoGimmeMoney." It was started by Keith and his sister.Link?
I don't think it's fair to say LE failed. We don't have access to the information they collected. IMO, from having followed this case from the beginning, LE conducted a very thorough investigation. The locals pulled in the FBI very early, two officers flew to Michigan to investigate the mystery man she was texting and planning to meet up with, they kept badgering her to come up with a description of the abductors which led to the release of a sketch, they did a forensic analysis of her clothes and found DNA of an unknown man. I think they probably had enough information to charge her, but the prosecutor decided not to, probably because of the Denise Huskins fiasco, which happened just a couple of months before.I agree that it shouldn't go to Sherri but IMO it should also not go to the officers that have failed to prove anything against her.
I'm against funds for failures.
I don't think it's fair to say LE failed. We don't have access to the information they collected. IMO, from having followed this case from the beginning, LE conducted a very thorough investigation. The locals pulled in the FBI very early, two officers flew to Michigan to investigate the mystery man she was texting and planning to meet up with, they kept badgering her to come up with a description of the abductors which led to the release of a sketch, they did a forensic analysis of her clothes and found DNA of an unknown man. I think they probably had enough information to charge her, but the prosecutor decided not to, probably because of the Denise Huskins fiasco, which happened just a couple of months before.
As others have suggested, you should read through all the threads here about the case. People on WS are generally very compassionate. There are reasons for the consensus opinion being what it is.I think to ruin someones reputation you absolutely have to have proof. Not this is likely the case like we are tossing back and forth but a smoking gun, coz me imagining Sherri telling the truth is depressing the hell out of me and i know wrongful convictions largely result from similar groupthink of this person must be lying because of an external issue.
As others have suggested, you should read through all the threads here about the case. People on WS are generally very compassionate. There are reasons for the consensus opinion being what it is.
911 call logs shed light on 'Super Mom' Sherri Papini's past
Sheriff investigating hate blog against Latinos in kidnapped mom case
bbmI don't think it's fair to say LE failed. We don't have access to the information they collected. IMO, from having followed this case from the beginning, LE conducted a very thorough investigation. The locals pulled in the FBI very early, two officers flew to Michigan to investigate the mystery man she was texting and planning to meet up with, they kept badgering her to come up with a description of the abductors which led to the release of a sketch, they did a forensic analysis of her clothes and found DNA of an unknown man. I think they probably had enough information to charge her, but the prosecutor decided not to, probably because of the Denise Huskins fiasco, which happened just a couple of months before.
I kind of 'skim' read.Consensus opinion is fine (despite being an oxymoron), this is clearly something else.
There's 23 prior threads no one with a life has time to read through all of them, that's not a reasonable suggestion at all.
I kind of 'skim' read.
Or speed read.
There are some cases that fascinate me but I lack the amount of time to sift through everything.
WS'rs are thorough in their posts and links. So there's a lot to cover.
The case of the apparent terrorist encampment in New Mexico where the children were rescued .... now that's sad but fascinating.
The first articles hinted towards the group having created a 'mock up' of an elementary school nearby and the people inc. children were being trained to carry out a military style attack.
They weren't just doing propaganda/brainwashing.
If you remember the photos... a plastic sheet-covered, painted sheetrock, and tire-surrounded compound.
Crazy.
Thanks.I'm the last person who'd mock anyone who needs any type of help, i've straight laid out my own problems here more than once..in unnecessary detail. Been mocked several times for it but whatever if you aren't doing well please message me i'll give you my all no questions asked!
I've never seen any evidence that proves Sherri Papini lied about what happened to her.
Until evidence comes forward that proves this was a hoax I will consider her to be a victim. JMO.
Thanks.
Sorry if you've felt mocked or 'slighted' by anyone here at WS.
I doubt it was anyone's intent.
This WS group is more "approachable" and balanced than some forums and sites.
She is home (I assume) with her family and doing well from the latest news.
And if the latest article is correct in stating that the family is living in seclusion for her emotional recovery -- someone is supporting them as the husband is probably not working and is caring for Sherri.
My point : If she needs help, there's assistance and they may be availing themselves of it.
As far as this forum, no one has mocked her.
But there are questions from members here at WS, and that's to be expected as it's rare for a kidnap victim to be released.
As far as this case , unless a new msm article comes out I'll be moving along.
At the very least without proof of nefariousness, accusing her in the manner a lot of people do without proof helps absolutely no one. People doing that are largely thinking of themselves and how they interpret the situation and not what went wrong and how it could be prevented. IMO.
I think everyone should take a step back and not allow themselves to feel involved in cases because it results in them feeling its personal and that's just the first step to wrongful conviction whether actual conviction or just publicly.