I really do love the way that he keeps contradicting himself.
From the Motion to strike, pages 2-3: "Aside from its blatant misrepresentations, however, is the fact that Royal Caribbean submitted evidence to the court without establishing the authenticity of such evidence."
From the Demand for All Videos:
View attachment 226665
How exactly can you claim to be using the same vantage point from camera that took the video, but then claim the video is "un-authenticated"?
"This photo shows the same view so clearly I can determine which camera it came from, but you can't prove that video is real or came from this camera because reasons"