dixiegirl1035
I will do it, but I won't like it
- Joined
- Oct 5, 2017
- Messages
- 12,887
- Reaction score
- 99,726
I think the Sept hearing date, under the umbrella of perm GUA, will be where BM provides evidence to the court that he did what he was granted permission to do. I trust that the court will confirm SM's ownership to any proceeds are protected, and that the permanent petition is withdrawn. MOO
This situation is bringing to mind another case we followed here.. what state was it in? Darn braincells can't recall.
I think it was the "woodchipper" or "burn/cremation for animals" case where the guy went out of state to check on his herd, get payment in arrears, and the guys killed him? Anyway, the wife very quickly went to the courts to take over his business to continue such business and do transactions on his behalf.
It was approved.
Not to be off topic, because for discussion sake I think this is on topic as to how such was done with a "missing person" (perhaps presumed dead at that time, but the wife was NEVER a suspect)
Can anyone recall which case in the last 3 years that was as I remember clearly, but can't recall the name or the state. Case name would help, link to such case at Websleuths even more.
TIA.. all above MOO
Last edited: