Wow! I never thought of that! Good call.Maybe it was watched online on AmazonPrime, Netfix or something like that? There would be digital evidence that this movie was watched.
Wow! I never thought of that! Good call.Maybe it was watched online on AmazonPrime, Netfix or something like that? There would be digital evidence that this movie was watched.
I'm no expert, but there seems to be quite a bit more evidence of GW4's involvement, including his purchase of some parts used to make the suppressor.
jmo it will interesting to see what all the Wagner’s sold and traded off prior to move to Alaska. Jmo I hope the state contacted every buyer. JmoIt's very likely they do have more evidence that hasn't been revealed. To clarify, the statement around caution with the word "never" wasn't pointed at his involvement.
I felt there were a few times the state said someone "never" did something.
If the defense can produce a photo or record that shows that person did do that particular thing at least once, as a juror I would start to question the narrative they are establishing.
In my opinion it's a risky move.
Oh my I have done something wrong on this post.
Jmo completely agree with you Betty, none of them deserved this. One thing I do wonder about did the state mean crj was asleep prior and then hid behind or beside the bed after he heard something? That was a little confusing because they said the other victims didn’t hear due to silencer but reports was he had at least sec to try to hide. And reports of one dropped call coming from the house.
But there again the reports could be wrong, but it did take a while to find him according to lm. I may just be confused on this part.
Hearing the voices of killers makes sense. ThanksI didn't hear the part about the dropped call. Was that from the hearing the other day?
CRJr, its still uncertain. AC said something to the effect that all but 2 were asleep when killed. CRJr must have heard something, perhaps the baby crying, perhaps the voices of the killers. There's probably no way of knowing exactly what caused him to awaken or when..
It's very likely they do have more evidence that hasn't been revealed. To clarify, the statement around caution with the word "never" wasn't pointed at his involvement.
I felt there were a few times the state said someone "never" did something.
If the defense can produce a photo or record that shows that person did do that particular thing at least once, as a juror I would start to question the narrative they are establishing.
In my opinion it's a risky move.
Is it too much to ask what you are referring to? Totally vague, so requires everyone to go back and listen to the whole hearing to see what you are talking about. JMO
She never lived there again, doesn't mean she never went back to see her son, which she did.Sorry to be so vague. I have been uncertain how to approach this without it coming off in an unintended way.
That state shared that Angela threatened to kill Tabby and she hid until she got away and never went back.
If the defense can show pictures of her at Defiance Farms or Flying W in recent years, my opinion is "never" isn't accurate. She would have been comfortable enough to come around and her mom was comfortable enough working for the Wagners.
It's just my opinion and how I would see it. I would start to second guess what are the absolutes and what are exaggerations from the State. The same way I would question them in my mind from the defense.
She never lived there again, doesn't mean she never went back to see her son, which she did.
Key word, Cool Cats!
She never lived there again, doesn't mean she never went back to see her son, which she did.