borndem
Anglophile & registered demwit
- Joined
- May 15, 2010
- Messages
- 19,000
- Reaction score
- 49,711
Possibly accessory before the fact.If the biological mom told police this was the plan can she be held responsible for anything?
Dunno. IANAL.
Possibly accessory before the fact.If the biological mom told police this was the plan can she be held responsible for anything?
Or what time he went to/left his house.Baby was born at 9:00 AM, Mom said Logan came to the house "later". Also no time stamps on the bridge pics LE was asking people to ID. If we knew what time he was seen walking, we would have a better idea of the timeline.
Yes ---- "it" ---- indeed. A probably perfect little girl.“Just get rid of it”
Seems to be the mindset.
JMO
If the poor child was shot in the head, there won't be much need for an autopsy.Surely an autopsy will be conducted determining Harper’s cause of death. This is beyond heartbreaking!
You must be not listening carefully. Yes, usually people like to torture and hurt them more before killing them but some prefer to make it as quick as possible so if they have a gun, they shoot.But I have never heard of someone shooting kittens in the head and leaving them covered with snow, let alone a live baby.
You must be not listening carefully. Yes, usually people like to torture and hurt them more before killing them but some prefer to make it as quick as possible so if they have a gun, they shoot.
And sorry for bringing that but after the fact everyone says how much loved she could be by foster parents. Would she be? There is so many stories about awful, horrific abuse, sexual abuse and denying food to the point that child barely keeps on going for years and years without any reaction from ss, neighbors, extended family, nor anyone else. It happens much often with foster/adoptive children than biological ones.
If i would fell pregnant while not able to take care of the child, I would wish this child dead before being born over fearing for the rest of my life that it's in fear, cold and hunger under the "care" of another pair of monsters found to fit to adopt or foster children.
I don't know if the mother knew or was involved in it but let's be real: there is no loved, accepted and cared for 16 yo, sane boy who would shoot a baby. If he's insane, then shame that it wasn't discovered and stopped earlier. If he wasn't then he's guilty of course but blaming him/them over those who made him or raised him this way should carry the majority of responsibility. Blindly blaming him over everyone around him it is just a way to accept it to happen over and over again.
I'm not suggesting to blame the parents, because it's not just a parents who raise a kid. What is and isn't accepted around him is raising him too.
Infanticide happens all the time is just usually the mother who detaches herself from the idea that the baby was ever alive in the first place. For the father to be the perpetrator and in a somewhat gruesome manner makes it more horrifying to us but the crime is still the same. This obviously would have never been a double murder because why wait until delivery for that?
Men simply do not have the same instincts when it comes to newborn babies that women do. Objectively speaking it would be unconscionable to sentence these sixteen year olds to death or to life without parole.
Yes this is a horrible crime but it's hard to imagine the whole of responsibility can be placed on a 16 year old boy. How was this pregnancy and the birth concealed? How did this boy have unchecked access to a handgun? Under what circumstances could this have been considered the best course of action?
Although apparently we have his identity because of Wisconsin law and the prosecutors conclusion that this meets the definition of first degree murder (it does appear to) I expect the perpetrator will be committed to a mental health facility for a few years followed by a minimal few years in prison and he will be free to attempt to live a normal life (most likely under a new name) before he turns 30.
I have mixed feelings on that progression of cases like this but one thing I consistently feel is that the parents of violent juvenile offenders are never adequately investigated.
bbm
Same here, Marg -- I was watching his eyes (what else can we see these days ), and I saw what had to be a smile -- a couple of times. I'm glad you mentioned it because I regretted my thoughts on it -- but I'm gonna un-regret them now. Yes, he was smiling IMHO, I agree. Why? He may be more of a kid than his age would indicate because he is in deep doodle-oo, and he should know it. Charged as an adult, and rightly so.
This is an awful, awful case.
With a mask on, it was hard to really determine emotional EQ. He was fidgety, moving side to side in his chair. I'd like to hear more about this kid's history and family life.He definitely smiled at least once. His eyes gave away no emotion at all,at that age even if he had no feeling at all for the atrocity he committed that he would at least be concerned for himself. What 16 yr old listens to people tell him he will be locked up forever and doesnt flinch?.
I believe this boy is a sociopath.
It happens much often with foster/adoptive children than biological ones.
With a mask on, it was hard to really determine emotional EQ. He was fidgety, moving side to side in his chair. I'd like to hear more about this kid's history and family life.
IF YOU CAN, WATCH THIS
IF YOU CAN, READ THIS.
I don't think you're wrong at all, I'd just like to observe him without a mask and in light of more background information on his life. But I do think the fidgeting was nervousness on his part.He seemed bored rather than uncomfortable IMO, he certainly didn't betray any emotion with his eyes.
To me he seemed cold unlike his father who held his hands over his face as though shocked or horrified a few times. This is all personal opinion of course and I am more than open to being wrong,in this case especially I really hope I am.
Not him but there's no denying that his assertion is objectively correctPlease can you supply research and evidence for this statement.