I find it interesting, the AP news article mentioned a page or two back, has this quote "Riley said investigators believe the man in the photos and in the new artist’s sketch killed both girls." That 'new artist's sketch' is the old sketch of BG.
The reason I bring this up is, it was stated as fact, at that time, that the old sketch was a sketch of the man believed to be the man on the bridge, and the man that killed both girls. And as we now know, this man in this first sketch, is not the man LE is currently seeking, rather, it is the man represented by the second sketch, unless, one wishes to believe that the sketches are of the same man, and that he, in reality will be a blend of the two sketches. Although it was also said, at one time, that the first sketch is now a man of no interest, or secondary interest in the case, meaning to me, that the man in the first sketch is clearly a different POI than the man in the second sketch. No wonder there is confusion relative to the matter.
It is stuff like this that leads me to be cautious in particular when reading news stories, whether they are approved or not, and in processing of information relative to this case.
