UK UK - Sarah Everard, 33, London - Clapham Common area, 3 March 2021 *Arrests* #8

[tesni]

Sarah Everard, 33, vanished as she walked home to Brixton, south London, from the Clapham Junction area.

She spoke to her partner en route but has not been heard from since about 21:30 GMT, friend Rose Woollard said.

Sarah Everard: Police 'increasingly concerned' for Brixton woman

https://twitter.com/LambethMPS/status/1367784499237576704?ref_src=twsrc^tfw|twcamp^tweetembed|twterm^1367784499237576704|twgr^|twcon^s1_c10&ref_url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-56281473

Link to MEDIA, MAPS & TIMELINE *NO DISCUSSION* thread

Thread #1
Thread #2
Thread #3
Thread #4
Thread #5 (thread pulled do to excessive TOS violations)
Thread #6
Thread #7

 

[Sillybilly]

ADMIN NOTE:

Hey everyone,

There are far too many TOS violations going on in this discussion. Please read TOS (aka The Rules, linked in my signature line) that everyone has agreed to upon registering with Websleuths, some of which includes:

All quoted material and information stated as fact must have a link to the source and ALL images require a link to the source. Always remember: No link, no post !!

Copyright rules are that no more than 10% of any article may be copied. It is not just a WS rule, it is copyright law.

Rumors are not allowed. This includes social media comments and/or hearsay.

Sleuthing of family, friends, or anyone else not officially named a POI / suspect is not allowed. Members may discuss what has been said in MSM about the person or what that person has said in MSM, but sleuthing out their personal information is not allowed. Members may sleuth this type of thing behind the scenes and discuss in private messaging with others, but it is not allowed to be posted on the public forum.

WS is victim friendly and victims include family, friends, and innocent persons. It is okay to have an opinion, but if your opinion is an insinuation or direct accusation of someone not officially named a POI or suspect, it is not allowed.

The thread is dedicated to discussion of Sarah's case. Anything else is off topic. If you have a question about The Rules, please private message a Mod or Admin for clarification rather than discussing it on the thread.

Thank you to everyone for your cooperation and for being here to discuss Sarah's case.

 

[Sillybilly]

Sleuthing the social media of family or friends is not allowed.

 

[Sillybilly]

ADMIN WARNING

Reminder: Snap Chat is NOT an approved source at Websleuths. Do not discuss it or your post will be removed and there may be a loss of posting privileges.

We have other threads to deal with and we simply do not have the staff to deal with the excessive number of Alerts we have been receiving.

If you do not KNOW that your post is in line with TOS, do not post. Further violations will result in a thread ban and possible closure of this discussion.

Post accordingly.

Thank you.

 

[Sillybilly]

Please review the above opening posts and continue discussion of Sarah's case here.

If you wish to check The Rules, you can do so at any time by simply clicking on the link in my signature line.

 

[CoverMeCagney]

Nice new thread, thanks. I've barely caught up on the previous two, could anyone post links with NEW or recent news here on page 1?

 

[Railsam85]

I also agree the cctv footage needs to be reported, it may be nothing, or they may be already aware, but it should be reported either way.

 

[tigerowl]

Nice new thread, thanks. I've barely caught up on the previous two, could anyone post links with NEW or recent news here on page 1?

Here's one (of many) that report he was in a hire car and not one of the family cars which will hopefully debunk the theory of the CCTV widely being discussed in the previous thread.

Sarah Everard: Met Police officer Wayne Couzens, 48, 'may have used warrant card to entice 33-year-old into car' (the-sun.com)

 

[Dowls90]

Car enthusiasts, let's fix this once and for all. What make of car is this please? Thank you!

EDIT: Front logo etc. ???

Apologies, I meant to attach this image with my last post. I'm thinking Mitsubishi.

 

[ElizaKate]

Image because I can't quote on a new thread

@Parmalade absolutely! We understand each other don't worry You're quite right. With everything going on I'm losing focus on what evidence is required for all the charges!

 

[Richard Yokely]

@Parmalade They won’t go to the CPS for any charging decisions until they’re happy they either haven’t got enough evidence to charge him for murder at the minute or his PACE clock is running out, to keep him in this long they need to go to Magistrates court to apply for an extension.

 

[Dadalorian]

Just a quick opinion linking the incidents:
If WCs indecent exposure was at a drive through, they collect license plates when giving out meals to the correct cars. Obviously if this wasnt followed up properly by LE, it goes under the radar.
Fast forward 4 days, and a woman goes missing. Same license plate is spotted in the area she was last seen by the bus' CCTV footage, links the 2 cases.

 

[ElizaKate]

ahhh it seems many haven't found the new thread... little breather for a min..

 

[Whitehall 1212]

They could charge him with indecent exposure and remand him in custody pending trial, with covid good chance trial not for a year or more with backlog so lot of time to question him on/build murder case

Pawel Relowicz was charged with indecent exposure while they built case against him for Libby

A sole charge of indecent exposure with possible charges for the kidnapping and murder later on down the line would have a number of unhelpful consequences. One being that the police and CPS will most likely want the indecency offence to form part of the same trial along with any charges of kidnapping and murder, as it can demonstrate recent prior criminal conduct/mindset, motive, MO etc. To charge the IE at a separate time could mean that it is dealt with at court in isolation.

Rest assured that the police have been doing a shed load of work in the background and will continue to do so by identifying, recovering, collating and linking the evidence sufficient for the CPS to authorise charges for the kidnapping and murder.

The SIO will be liaising very closely with the CPS prosecutor, who will be reviewing the evidence until he/she is confident that it meets the evidential element of the the CPS two stage test for a charge to be authorised. The prosecutor will be advising on areas of evidence which need strengthening and the SIO and her officers will be addressing these.

 

[Tinytina]

Apologies, I meant to attach this image with my last post. I'm thinking Mitsubishi.

View attachment 288278

I agree, Mitsubishi

 

[Rosegold68]

'heavy sentence' for indecent exposure as a stand alone case, yes. He would lose his job, spend time inside and be on sex offenders list.

 

[Nikynoo]

Sorry, I can't remember who wanted this - it was at the end of the last thread
Examples of the type of conduct appropriate for a charge of assisting an offender include:

• hiding a principal offender;
• otherwise assisting a principal offender to avoid arrest;
• assisting a principal offender to abscond from bail;
• lying to the police to protect principal offenders from investigation and prosecution;
• hiding the weapon used in an assault/robbery;
• washing clothes worn by a principal offender to obstruct any potential forensic examination.

Perverting the Course of Justice
The offence of Perverting the Course of Justice is committed when an accused:

• does an act or series of acts;
• which has or have a tendency to pervert; and
• which is or are intended to pervert;
• the course of public justice.

The offence is contrary to common law and triable only on indictment. It carries a maximum penalty of life imprisonment and/or a fine. The course of justice must be in existence at the time of the act(s). The course of justice starts when:

• an event has occurred, from which it can reasonably be expected that an investigation will follow;
• investigations which could/might bring proceedings have actually started; or
• proceedings have started or are about to start.

Public Justice Offences incorporating the Charging Standard | The Crown Prosecution Service

 

[Columboshound]

A sole charge of indecent exposure with possible charges for the kidnapping and murder later on down the line would have a number of unhelpful consequences. One being that the police and CPS will most likely want the indecency offence to form part of the same trial along with any charges of kidnapping and murder, as it can demonstrate recent prior criminal conduct/mindset, motive, MO etc. To charge the IE at a separate time could mean that it is dealt with at court in isolation.

Rest assured that the police have been doing a shed load of work in the background and will continue to do so, collecting the evidence sufficient for the CPS to authorise charges for the kidnapping and murder.

The SIO will be liaising very closely with the CPS prosecutor, who will be reviewing the evidence until he/she is confident that it meets the evidential element of the the CPS two stage test. The prosecutor will be advising on areas of evidence which need strengthening and the SIO and her officers will be addressing these.

I just hope they find all of the evidence they need. Given he’s a cop and forensically aware plus the delay in his arrest and thus sufficient time to clean up. Then the fact there’s been no sightings or known CCTV with him and Sarah together... all very concerning although I guess Cressida wouldn’t have said he was the guy if there wasn’t enough evidence

 

[Princessconsuela]

I also agree the cctv footage needs to be reported, it may be nothing, or they may be already aware, but it should be reported either way.

On the last thread someone said it had been reported via twitter dm.

 

[Nikynoo]

@Parmalade They won’t go to the CPS for any charging decisions until they’re happy they either haven’t got enough evidence to charge him for murder at the minute or his PACE clock is running out, to keep him in this long they need to go to Magistrates court to apply for an extension.

dont they need a definite id for the remains before charging?