D
Deleted member 102539
Guest
"a whole new line" .....!!Two parts I find Interesting in this article.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
"a whole new line" .....!!Two parts I find Interesting in this article.
Two parts I find Interesting in this article.
"a whole new line" .....!!
And going back to car behind the Ranger - there’s never been an appeal regarding this vehicle and I think it’s generally supposed that it was eliminated early on - does anyone know if that is actually the case?[/QUOTE
Unfortunately there is not enough detail in either of the sightings to draw any conclusions. We know nothing about the person who spotted the rucksack at the Uni and nothing about the person who went in the NH.
It often appears in this case that so much is held back it doesnt allow you to gain any traction in going forward with 'anything'
Neither of these "concerned citizens" brought evidence to the police. Why didnt Melsom call the police? Both incidents are lies and distractions, and to support a narrative that she was still alive on Thursday and or went to work.
If nothing else Jim must have been able to give a discription of the person who went in the NH. Did the discription match that of the person who spotted a rucksack at the Uni or was the Uni sighting given annonymously.
It looks like Interviews are still well placed!I wonder if this is recent information is from a new source @FromGermany or has he uncovered some detail previously overlooked in the previous investigations?
Is the new info related to the Wayne Couzens?
Or someone else previously dismissed by the previous investigation teams.
Could be what he’s been reading here on WS!"a whole new line" .....!!
Looks like MD has a newly found determination to stir things up, now that Peter has diedIt looks like Interviews are still well placed!
What has @FromGermany reported to the police?I wonder if this is recent information is from a new source @FromGermany or has he uncovered some detail previously overlooked in the previous investigations?
Is the new info related to the Wayne Couzens?
Or someone else previously dismissed by the previous investigation teams.
I would do the same. Odd though as thought Peter and Jen were close xLooks like MD has a newly found determination to stir things up, now that Peter has died
What has @FromGermany reported to the police?
And a Scarf, Did Claudia usually wear a scarf. I ask as maybe it would indicate the likelihood of those Items belonging to Claudia.I fail to leave home without a scarf ,even now we are in march xI seem to have failed to understand how to post things on here! A woman goes missing, you see what you think is her rucksack, a vital piece of evidence, but it mysteriously vanishes before the police get there and you give the information anonymously? Really? Second person finds personal effects, photographs them, doesn't call the police at all, takes them not to the police but her local pub. There, the people who all love her an want her back, casually advise he takes his photos to the police. They don't call the police, they don't take his name, the don't ask him to wait, they don't ask him where he found the items, they don't get upset because if she was missing and alive, she would be wearing one shoe now?
There’s the rub - with no hint as to what the potential new line is, how do the people giving the information relating to it know NYP want them to get back in touch?I found this part interesting
Mr Fox said some of the information received by the force “appears extremely interesting and sparks a whole new line of investigation”, and he urged anyone providing this information to get back in touch with as much detail as possible.
Im very keen to know what what info has sparked a whole new line of investigation and who has provided it?
Looks like it was given annonymously as he appeals for them to get back in touch with as much detail as possible.
Nothing, haha! I have no knowledge at all in the case, unfortunately.What has @FromGermany reported to the police?
I think Mr Fox means the people who gave the info anonymously. He can't ask them specific questions if he doesn't know who they are.There’s the rub - with no hint as to what the potential new line is, how do the people giving the information relating to it know NYP want them to get back in touch?
No, I haven't, both were anonymous, they cant follow either up. Melsom couldn't remember the man in the pub. No one else there could either. Why would anyone photograph one shoe and a scarf of a possible murder victim, and then take it to the woman's local pub? Ridiculous lies. My guess is they don't want to totally discount the back pack just in case, however, there isn't any solid evidence she either made it home on 18th, or left for work from home on 19th. That why the childminder and lift have been removed from the timeline.@DameAgathaPoirot Can I ask if you have asked Cold Case for some clarity on the two.
They make ref to the Uni sighting on the NYP website but chose not to mention J.M's account of the person who went into the NH.
It would be interesting to how NYP stand on this, and help everyone focus on what is correct and substantiated.
We don't know. WC might be. I often think so these days, when I'm reading about the many searches in case Sarah. It seems, police are looking for more victims perhaps, otherwise I wouldn't know, what they are expecting to find.I wonder if this is recent information is from a new source @FromGermany or has he uncovered some detail previously overlooked in the previous investigations?
Is the new info related to the Wayne Couzens?
Or someone else previously dismissed by the previous investigation teams.