If the phone remained in the Heworth area till 1000 it points very heavily away from the street abduction theory. To sustain the abduction theory, you would have to explain both why she didn't take the phone with her, and how the phone later disappeared from her house.
If the Galloway investigation was in possession of this 'fact' the subsequent course of the investigation becomes almost unfathomable. More likely, it is either not a fact, or they were not in possession of this information until later (which raises different questions).
If the Galloway investigation was in possession of this 'fact' the subsequent course of the investigation becomes almost unfathomable. More likely, it is either not a fact, or they were not in possession of this information until later (which raises different questions).
With respect and hindsight to a very accomplished detective. Any job through the eyes of a professional he will of checked the most likely first given the importance of finding her quickly - the first 48hrs. It’s a 50/50 - she may have left the house to elsewhere of her own free will - she may of forgotten to take her phone, tired busy? Have you ever left your phone at home? I have. Looking at the evidence it points away from her home towards work. However A.C. In my opinion was outside at 6.55am why? A curry a heavy night - sleeps on the sofa - allegedly - back to Heworth early in the morning on foot?