I can see a killer from another state currently doing this. BUT if he had prior knowledge and experience in his past OR made a few visits to the site in the year or two prior. Predicting his victims? Nah, I believe they were victims of opportunity - wrong place, wrong time. That he would predict they would be there at that time and place, no way. Wrong place, wrong time. In fact, if Abigail and Liberty decided to not be on the bridge that day this may have not occurred on 13 Feb 2017. But maybe someplace else, somewhere else at at a later date.sorry but how would a killer from another state ..find a killing location and predict his victims beforehand and search them on google and also predict that in the future they will visit that bridge ?
this in the sci fi zone
sorry but how would a killer from another state ..find a killing location and predict his victims beforehand and search them on google and also predict that in the future they will visit that bridge ?
this in the sci fi zone
sorry but how would a killer from another state ..find a killing location and predict his victims beforehand and search them on google and predict the future that they will visit one day ?
this in the sci fi zone
Forgive me if this has been discussed as nauseam, but I find this interview with County Sheriff Tobe Leazenby in February 2021 odd, in terms of the highlighted question and response.
That is not the twist, or even one of the twists I expected. I expected the twist to be related to the actual crime itself, not how surprised LE was not to solve this quickly.
County Sheriff answers double homicide questions from readers | Carroll County Comet
I can see a killer from another state currently doing this. BUT if he had prior knowledge and experience in his past OR made a few visits to the site in the year or two prior. Predicting his victims? Nah, I believe they were victims of opportunity - wrong place, wrong time. That he would predict they would be there at that time and place, no way. Wrong place, wrong time. In fact, if Abigail and Liberty decided to not be on the bridge that day this may have not occurred on 13 Feb 2017. But maybe someplace else, somewhere else at at a later date.
“The twist” could not be their inability to solve the case quickly. Because the word was first used in 2017, and at that time no one would have predicted the case being cold in 4+ years.
The way I interpret his words in the interview is, “the twist is, many kids who disappear are found alive, and these girls were found dead”.
(Totally inappropriate use of the word “twist” in such a context, to me it equals uttering “quelle surprise!”, on finding two bodies, and I hope I am misinterpreting Tobe’s explanation).
This peaked my interest. A while ago I was looking for comparisons using Google Trends. Essentially you can input several search key words and then it shows you how often it's been searched. You can narrow down the results by geography such as state and city.
What struck me was that in the months leading up to the murder no one really searched "Monon High Bridge". However, I could see that someone googled for "Monon High Bridge" from Chicago, IL. I've attached a screenshot that shows this.
The following is speculation, but I think BG could potentially be from the Chicago area and have searched for suitable sites online, including the "Monon High Bridge".
Edit: I attached a second screenshot from Google Trends where it can be seen that keywords "Abigail Williams", "Libby German", and "Monon High Bridge" were all searched from Chicago in the months leading up to the murder.
There are other SM places, where he could have looked for the girls, based upon their infos on their facebook or whatever. Maybe he is a "sleuther" and a very excellent one.sorry but how would a killer from another state ..find a killing location and predict his victims beforehand and search them on google and predict the future that they will visit one day ?
this in the sci fi zone
I... but I think that another more experienced police force need to review this case and see if they have a better strategy. The FBI took over in the Gabby Petito case and the pace increased significantly.
....
“The twist” could not be their inability to solve the case quickly. Because the word was first used in 2017, and at that time no one would have predicted the case being cold in 4+ years.
The way I interpret his words in the interview is, “the twist is, many kids who disappear are found alive, and these girls were found dead”.
(Totally inappropriate use of the word “twist” in such a context, to me it equals uttering “quelle surprise!”, on finding two bodies, and I hope I am misinterpreting Tobe’s explanation).
According to posts here, where it is assumed the creek was crossed was no more than knee deep. However there is no guarantee that this was the case. ImoI have always thought the "twist" in this case was:
The perp wanted to physically assault Libby and Abby in a certain way.
Jeans waist high in cold water stopped that from happening...(some body parts tend to shrink in icy water)
Had the perp been able to perform, they would have DNA to catch him.
So had the perp got what he wanted, they would have found him by now.
That is the twist.
...just my thoughts.
I don't think the perp ever wanted to cross the icy water.
It's possible:
Libby, being a swimmer, knew there was a possibility the perp couldn't swim, and she was a good swimmer. She took the chance and took to the water. Libby couldn't swim with her heavy shoes soaked, and her heavy sweats soaked, so she took them off herself to speed up her escape. Abby, having on tight (non cushioned) shoes, and tight (not thick material) jeans, didn't need to shed her clothes (and couldn't in a flash), they weren't weighing her down in the water like Libby's were her. This is why Abby was found fully clothed.
The perp knew Libby's clothes were now out in the open, to be found by any body at any second.
He couldn't clean up her clothes "mess" and manage the two girls too, and his goal (SA) was ruined by the icy cold water.
He had to end the scenario as quickly as possible, and give himself time to run before somebody discovered Libby's clothes.
I think he was at that location since early that morning. fishing or something.
I would check out fishing/hunting licenses at and around that time for anybody in that area with the suspect's description. AND try to find pics of anybody who regularly fished there. He's local and walking among them. moo.
According to posts here, where it is assumed the creek was crossed was no more than knee deep. However there is no guarantee that this was the case. Imo
Yes, that was up or down stream not sure which way from the shallow area where it is speculated they crossed the creekI'm new here and don't know how to insert pics yet, but do a Google image search on: searchers water Abby Libby.
look at the pics.
That water is way above those searcher's knees.
Yes, that was up or down stream not sure which way from the shallow area where it is speculated they crossed the creek
I'm new here and don't know how to insert pics yet, but do a Google image search on: searchers water Abby Libby.
look at the pics.
That water is way above those searcher's knees.
Are we allowed to talk about the geocaching aspect here? It's frowned upon on reddit. I do geocaching and am interested in this angle.