There are many aspects of his representation that have reasonably raised eyebrows from a legal ethics perspective. Because the potential for a criminal trial of BL is now moot, there may be nothing to make of his choices, but choosing to represent 3 related people in a national missing person/homicide investigation case, in a jurisdiction(s) in which he is not admitted, on a scale he has not ever dealt with, as a solo practitioner, in a subject-matter area that is not his top practice area is a lot to manage. Again, in and of themselves, those are not clear ethical breaches, especially where the case ended, but most attorneys would think long and hard about it and would be exceedingly precise and careful in their day-to-day handling of all aspects of the representation.