That is why I like this judge and why I think he's fair. He's going to make his decisions based on the law and I said earlier I don't get the feeling he's a judge who wants to set precedent. In the end I think these hearings and motions on both sides will be fairly adjudicated. A good well balanced argument backed up by good citation and case study is going to "win" the motion in the long run
https://www.fox21news.com/wp-conten...blic-Documents-Sept-2021-thru-Oct-15-2021.pdf
Points of interest from the Sept-Oct 15, 2021 batch:
Pg 38/141.
BM's 2020 Ford F350 and the contents were seized on May 5, 2021. (This is the truck BM purchased in June 2020 after SM vanished). Truck valued at $80,000. Per the defense motion, the contents of the truck included BM's work tools and $6,000 cash. Gives new meaning to Barry being the ATM!
Pg 56/141.
Contrary to DA's belief, Mr. Morphew does not pay rent at a Poncha Blvd address, nor has he ever spent the night at this address. This is SD's.
Pgs 66/141, 126-128, and 129-131.
Going back to the June 2 hearing and Eytan's allegations of discovery violations by the prosecutor, she made several including how BM's US Constitutional rights were being violated because of issues the defense was having with the discovery or lack of. At that time, I recall Judge Murphy citing that in his court, Colorado Rule Crim P. 16 governed, and the court had no authority to require what Eytan was requesting.
Pg 133/141.
Judge Murphy (again) advises the defense the court lacks authority to require the prosecution to create and produce and inventory discovery. The court further denied the defense request for the prosecutor to provide an inventory of Brady material as not allowed under Rule 16.
Pg 134/141.
Seems the parties were under the misconception that the court had ordered their pleadings filed as suppressed (i.e., not available to the public). Confirming the court never made this order, and all future pleadings are presumed to be public or protected. The clerk of the court was to change all suppressed motions to "public."
Not sure why the court site still has not been updated with the case files.
Whether that will hinder a couple of married men to have an affair in the near future?? A dangerous thing to tinker with a married lady, if she disappears one day or is even murdered by her "unsuspecting" husband.
LOL at the DM and their dramatic headlines! “ set to take the stand “.
Strangely enough, MM2 seems more relaxed and unencumbered than MM1, when she accompanies her father to court. I wonder.
ITA.
Yeah Daily Fail must not have any legal counsel whatsoever because clearly they don't have understanding of what that list really is. The sad thing is people really believe what they read from them. I do have to give them props for the great papparazi they have.
@Cindizzi Thx for verifying that BM was in that pic of newish looking gate (presumably Monarch River Est. entrance) because I kinda doubted it was BM.
It all depends on how detailed the prosecution wants to get with motive. It's not required of course, but the jury likes to know why a crime occurred.
If the defense is going to call him, then you call him. Take the wind out of their sails.
I agree, think we’ll hear from him. Better for the prosecution to have him testify to try to control the narrative than for defense to put him on the stand.
