Mrs G Norris
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- May 20, 2010
- Messages
- 14,077
- Reaction score
- 6,172
So they are team FP’s, and still in contact. FM is a little on the controlling side, yes?
Australia Australia - William Tyrrell, 3, Kendall, Nsw, 12 Sept 2014 - #61
- Thread starter Coldpizza
- Start date
- Status
So they are team FP’s, and still in contact. FM is a little on the controlling side, yes?
TootsieFootsie
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- May 24, 2012
- Messages
- 12,972
- Reaction score
- 85,869
Last edited:
nightrider17
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jun 18, 2017
- Messages
- 510
- Reaction score
- 4,227
So 18 months ago - they started investigating - that's May 2020. Is this new witness one of the people whose name was not disclosed during the Inquest? using a annoymous name?? Maybe its a new witness because what they saw/heard - may have originally seemed insignificant - so wasn't followed up initially. Do you think this witness has been found by Lawyers for POI who need named cleared, not from police investigation.
A common statement is that FM didn't have time to cover anything up. I disagree. For a well organized person, 25 mins is a long time. FM has stated she drove (which car) to the riding school (any witnesses?) It think when you consider it takes just 60 seconds or so to jump in and out of the car, and it is a few mins here or there, 25 mins is ample time to move a small body.
Could he have been assumed deceased by a fall by FM, dumped 8 mins away, but then regained consciousness and encountered further foul play? Just thinking about the Newcastle beach murder in the 90s (sorry can't remember the details).
Could he have been assumed deceased by a fall by FM, dumped 8 mins away, but then regained consciousness and encountered further foul play? Just thinking about the Newcastle beach murder in the 90s (sorry can't remember the details).
Blues Clues
Former Member
- Joined
- Apr 28, 2018
- Messages
- 566
- Reaction score
- 4,451
My interpretation of that is, the experts are giving their opinion. In their experience of 'graves' remains are typically in the 15 - 30cm layer. If he is buried he will be in the 15-30cm layer.
Police told Daily Mail Australia on Saturday that forensic hydrologist and layers expert Professor Jon Olley and graves specialist Dr Tony Lowe had advised excavators to scrape off dirt down to a layer 15 and 30cm below the surface.
'He'll be in there,' a police spokesman said the scientists have told officers working on the scene.
William Tyrrell investigation will take MONTHS as police dig up 1km of ground in Kendall | Daily Mail Online
Morrisa
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jun 20, 2015
- Messages
- 1,670
- Reaction score
- 8,752
Sorry Mrs G? Who are they? Do You mean Lia Harris?
Without context of whole conversations, it's hard to know if they are saying 'if there, he will be in that section' or 'he's in there'.
that's a huge issue with the reporting, there's lack of context in much of it.
Trivento
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Dec 5, 2020
- Messages
- 573
- Reaction score
- 2,158
Yes ..agree ..think it was the sensationalised headline stating “ he’ll be in there” without context that gives a false impression about what the scientist said..
Typical press spin as usual..
Daily mail is notorious for it. It's much like the National enquirer (or New Idea)
Just in terms of the new direction:
So we know the new person with evidence isn't LT as she is not new to the matter.
But they have removed her from FFC and MFC house [on account of the new information].
It follows that they've interviewed her, sought an AVO, and charged the FCs for assault.
The FGC died months ago, and her car has been collected for forensic testing now. That the car was collected at the same time LT was removed from her FCs says the new information was separate to those events, but precipitated them.
The new information is said to have come during the inquiry, and so I'm of the opinion that something raised during the inquiry alerted someone to the fact that they may have information or have been a witness, when they previously didn't believe they were.
IMO, the issues about the timing of the photo fits this because if you saw something random earlier in the morning you wouldn't have thought it was relevant given we were all told WT was alive and colouring in on the back deck at 9.30am. During the inquiry when the time tentatively opened up to 7.30am-11am then a neighbour, someone hiking, or a random passer-by might have thought 'well actually... earlier i did see something, but I discounted it because he was alive in the photo two hours later'.
IMO the search areas 'not being speculative in any way' means there was a witness, or someone had to mind a specific account of events.
I don't know that I believe the FFC and/or the MFC and FGC were involved in a coverup. The still hot tea and strange 000 call and the issues with the shoes and their timelines leads me to think yes. But everything else has me thinking it's unlikely - seemingly 'normal' people don't dispose of a child's body, make a cup of tea and then get the country riled up about said child's disappearance.
But I do think they've lied about the timeframe, and other than a cover up, I can't fathom why. In fact a kidnapping in FFC's "5 minutes" in a yard in Kendall is extremely unlikely, unless there was alot more time for it to have taken place. If FFC had sent WT down to the road to watch for dad earlier, the time it would have allowed for him to wander or be snatched would have been more easily believable. (Noting also, that they did mention this in some accounts and this is what LT said WT was doing).
So we know the new person with evidence isn't LT as she is not new to the matter.
But they have removed her from FFC and MFC house [on account of the new information].
It follows that they've interviewed her, sought an AVO, and charged the FCs for assault.
The FGC died months ago, and her car has been collected for forensic testing now. That the car was collected at the same time LT was removed from her FCs says the new information was separate to those events, but precipitated them.
The new information is said to have come during the inquiry, and so I'm of the opinion that something raised during the inquiry alerted someone to the fact that they may have information or have been a witness, when they previously didn't believe they were.
IMO, the issues about the timing of the photo fits this because if you saw something random earlier in the morning you wouldn't have thought it was relevant given we were all told WT was alive and colouring in on the back deck at 9.30am. During the inquiry when the time tentatively opened up to 7.30am-11am then a neighbour, someone hiking, or a random passer-by might have thought 'well actually... earlier i did see something, but I discounted it because he was alive in the photo two hours later'.
IMO the search areas 'not being speculative in any way' means there was a witness, or someone had to mind a specific account of events.
I don't know that I believe the FFC and/or the MFC and FGC were involved in a coverup. The still hot tea and strange 000 call and the issues with the shoes and their timelines leads me to think yes. But everything else has me thinking it's unlikely - seemingly 'normal' people don't dispose of a child's body, make a cup of tea and then get the country riled up about said child's disappearance.
But I do think they've lied about the timeframe, and other than a cover up, I can't fathom why. In fact a kidnapping in FFC's "5 minutes" in a yard in Kendall is extremely unlikely, unless there was alot more time for it to have taken place. If FFC had sent WT down to the road to watch for dad earlier, the time it would have allowed for him to wander or be snatched would have been more easily believable. (Noting also, that they did mention this in some accounts and this is what LT said WT was doing).
Reneemaree88
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 26, 2021
- Messages
- 69
- Reaction score
- 515
I also heard on the pod cast she didn’t take her phone with her when she went on that drive. Maybe so she didn’t get tracked? Why didn’t she mention it on the day?
Just read daily mail story by Iddle William Tyrrell case explained by Australia's greatest detective Rod Iddles | Daily Mail Online
2 interesting points
1. so new info gave from someone that was not interviewed- wondering who that person could be - sounds like some confided in much later -maybe nurse who heard friend of FA give some info about picking him & child up or someone else we don’t know ??
2. Maybe body was moved several times , and then back to former house of FG …. why would someone do that ? to keep eye on it ? Make sure it is not found … the house was sold - and FP have no more connection to house ??So would need to be someone stilL Living in area ??so they can see it hadn’t been disturbed ??
I keep coming back to motive ???
2 interesting points
1. so new info gave from someone that was not interviewed- wondering who that person could be - sounds like some confided in much later -maybe nurse who heard friend of FA give some info about picking him & child up or someone else we don’t know ??
2. Maybe body was moved several times , and then back to former house of FG …. why would someone do that ? to keep eye on it ? Make sure it is not found … the house was sold - and FP have no more connection to house ??So would need to be someone stilL Living in area ??so they can see it hadn’t been disturbed ??
I keep coming back to motive ???
Didn't the FM sibling visit during the initial search period (picked them up from the airport). Maybe they recalled something?
As a horse rider, I'll say you're more likely to have a broken bone than a bruise from falling off, and a kick leaves a very specific hoof-shaped mark (it's a great hobby )
Super sorry if this has been covered already. Got a lot of catching up to do.
Do we have a confirmed source for the bolded?
If this is true, then why in all that is bloomin' does someone who only arrived the night before need to use the washing machine? Didn't arrive with clean clothes? No spares? Someone wet the bed? Can't do a regular soak and hand wash in the laundry basin?
Odd too. Generally if you are searching and someone is home, you take your phone so they can call you if they find them
Yes , but was she already known to investigators, she might have been questioned .. I took it to mean unconnected person
stormyseas
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Mar 9, 2015
- Messages
- 562
- Reaction score
- 4,182
I wonder if suggestion of FFC having a second phone is relevant? Perhaps she didn’t take her known phone with her on the drive, but maybe she took the second one? Could the new witness have given information about the existence of a second phone which has now led to investigations around the location of that phone on the morning of WT’s disappearance? IMO
Eloise
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 19, 2014
- Messages
- 2,480
- Reaction score
- 8,965
this article is over a year old. Context for you posting it?
- Status