steeltowngirl
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Mar 2, 2014
- Messages
- 6,427
- Reaction score
- 90,304
RL on 2/16/17 at :32
We had the KAK news and affidavit, and now the RL warrant. Little by little, LE is releasing details about the case. We’ve hoped for years we’d get some factual information. It was always kept under wraps to protect the integrity of the case.
But now I’m worried. Is this a sign that LE doesn’t expect to ever bring to trial whoever was responsible for the murders of Abby and Libby?
I don't think it's a sign that LE will never charge someone with this crime.
I think this case is like the Suzanne Morphew case in that information has been gradually released over time.
JMVHO.
Except he wasn’t. He drove that morning, breaking the law, not asking for an alibi. And he drove at 4:45, breaking the law, not asking for an alibi. He only asked for an alibi for a time when he wasn’t driving. That’s why it’s so suspicious, he asked for an alibi for the time of the murders before anyone but the killer (and apparently RL) knew there had been a murder.I think this speaks to RL trying to cover something up and not being super sophisticated. He's not thinking about an alibi for a crime, just that he was in violation at the time of the crime. I've been thinking about how he asked for an alibi for later in the day, but not the morning of the 13th. Yes, it's super suspicious that he asked for it prior to the girls being found but I think this could be explained by the fact that the there was a huge community and news outreach for the search for the girls. I'm sure the timeline of when the girls went missing, 3pm, was public knowledge pretty early on. So he's not panicking about covering a crime, just that 3pm time period where he was breaking the law.
Yes- they were requesting help from locals to search for the girls. Over local radio IIRC.I've read on a bunch of different occasions a kind of haphazard search happened after 6:30 PM, with people joining in through the evening.
LE were called by MP at 5:30.
I don’t think there is a space before “weapon” but a slash. Knife/weapon or blade/weapon fit.Caution, graphic language is used in this post. This entire post is my opinion only.
Below is pasted a paragraph from the RL search warrant, which was linked in the news story at FBI agent believed clothing taken and bodies 'staged' in Delphi murders search warrant request
The search warrant states the girls "were found dead with wounds caused by a <redacted> weapon."
In my opinion, the word "blade" or as another poster suggested, "sharp" could be the redacted word. The size of the word "blade" and "sharp" is consistent with the size of the redaction, and information about the large amount of blood found at the crime scene would be consistent with the girls being stabbed/slashed to death by a knife. So I think the mystery of how the girls were killed can now be stated with a degree of certainty, despite LE's withholding the cause of death.
May the murderer be caught soon.
View attachment 344590
RL on 2/16/17 at :32
YES>>> LE did not search his property for A MONTH... a month afterwards.I understand all that.
A month later, though? Sounds to me like RL was one of a scant few people they were investigating in the weeks after the murders.
People were tipping him in based on his appearance, saying he looked like BG? LE figured these were credible tips?
Looks to me like they were flailing about, clueless about where to point the direction of the investigation.
Who is the second man that was interviewed? The man that said it would be impossible to carry someone up the trail? I am just curious, I didn't see a name on the interview.
One more link - Logan interviews with Inside Edition on 03/17/17.
Logan discusses his alibi with the interviewer.
I downloaded the PDF as well. I had to join the FB group to find them in the files area. Got tagged in an announcement welcoming several hundred new members, probably most of which followed the clues from here to go get that exact same PDF.
Looks like they REALLY thought they had their man. Based on what? My speculation is that proximity carried the most weight. He just happened to be the closest <modsnip> to the crime scene? And I'm guessing since he was allowed to continue living his life that they found no evidence whatsoever. He didn't strike me as the most meticulous person that ever lived, so continuing to speculate, I'd guess there was no evidence to be found. So most likely just the nearest, unluckiest <modsnip> that ever lived. The alibi creation bugs me, though...
I think the problem with assuming things don't fit is assuming the witness statements are accurate at all. If the murderer couldn't have left the scene without blood on them, that leaves two option, the murderer changed clothes or the witness(es) who saw the man leaving the trail area after the murders saw someone else (or weren't paying enough attention to see blood, I suppose). It also assumes the vehicle parked at the CPS building had anything to do with the murders. Why park at the CPS building instead of the parking lot at the trail or near the storage buildings? Especially if it was a planned murder. I don't think crossing a road and being that close to town would be wise if you are planning on murdering someone and planning on leaving in the vehicle.I guess there are things about this RL affidavit that might have made more sense back in 2017, but now, it doesn't fit. The first sketch and description was still too young to be RL. In the April 2019 PC, LE released a new, younger sketch and discussed a vehicle parked in the CPS lot. What reason would RL have to park at a lot farther away than his own driveway?
Later, as recently as 2020, LE was interviewing KAK, telling him he was the last person to talk to L on the day they died, as a_shots. They've had two public asks specific to a_shots.
Then, we have BMcD asking KAK if he and his dad knew RL. Was that just a random question, or did she know something we don't? Maybe RL was caught up in the CSAM case, on some level. Who knows, but in the last few months, LE is not asking about RL, they are asking about a_shots.
ETA: Which odds are better? A 77 year old man knowing he might get caught on a probation violation lying and using his phone on his own property? Or a younger man charged with CSAM, who admittedly groomed young girls, including L, who lied and followed the case closely, and whose fake profile was the last to speak with one of the murder victims?
In the second video look at what Ron is wearing, I found it startling the very first time I saw that clip many years ago.Here is RL speaking about what happened after girls were murdered. Below are links