AfterMidnight
Former Member
- Joined
- Aug 2, 2007
- Messages
- 311
- Reaction score
- 8
Okay, lets move on. Why do you think a Ped would only take 1 child out of 3? Why not all three? (or at least the 2 girls) . If it was a pedo ring, then there would be more than one accomplice, no?
It is a lot easier to take one child, that was specified, than to handle 3. While there probably was another accomplice, 3 would attract too much attention and pose triple the risk.
According to the McCanns statement, Maddie was sleeping BETWEEN the twins. They would have to reach over one child, without waking it, and lift Maddie over it, and escape. Seems odd.
As colomom stated, there is disagreement about the sleeping arrangments. My understanding is Maddie had her own bed.
Maddie was very short for her age, not much taller than her twin siblings...They all look very similar, Why take the one that would offer the most resistance?
Because Maddie was the one specified. If the perp had wanted a different child, that child would have been specified. The perp wanted MADDIE.
Why take the one with better language skills?
The plan was for Maddie never to be seen again, one way or the other. What difference if she has language skills?
Why take the one that was openly shown to have temper tantrums? Why her and not any of the other children in the group? What do you think?
Again, I think the perp wanted MADDIE and only MADDIE.