ID - 4 Univ of Idaho Students Murdered - Bryan Kohberger Arrested - Moscow # 67

Status
Not open for further replies.
Or it could be that you guys want to give this guy a lot more credit than he deserves.....?

I know a few people with PhDs that can barely get themselves around a city without getting flustered. Or can't organize an event. Or are really good at talking about what they studied but struggle when applying the work.

A lot of the 'Maybe Bryan didn't do it!' it folk (not saying you) base their entire theories on the redemption genius stories they love seeing in movies. They just don't like the ending of this one.
I don't see any of that on here. I more often see derogatory comments towards BK calling him names. He is well educated, and has obtained degrees the VAST majority of Americans never do. If he is guilty of these crimes, he certainly made mistakes while committing them. Beyond that, there is no need to insult his intelligence, IMO.
 
IMO he had the spot picked out for the knife and the clothes weeks or months before he went through with the murders.

But then again....he made mistakes in planning and at the scene during the crime. So tossing it out the window at a McDonald's drive thru isn't even a stretch at this point.
During one of my Google searches in this case (that would make me look suspicious if I ever did anything bad!) I looked up places to hide a knife and one of the first answers was...in a tree! Like fairly high up, deep at the base of a branch where it joins the tree. I agree with @SRWCF that it will probably be found by accident years from now. I wonder if anyone's ever done a plea deal (LWOP; no death penalty) to give up the location of a weapon?
 
I think the question "why didn't you call the police?" is likely to come up on cross, so the prosecutor will get there first. "Why didn't you check on your roommates?" "Why did you wait so long...?" --the same stuff that comes up in the media and on here.
No reason for the defense to do this, IMO, unless they want to build their case around DM being an accomplice, which they won't. Her "failure" to call 911 in a timely manner doesn't change the outcome of the crime. She is one of the victims here.

Also, I noted in the unsealed search warrant on page 21, it speaks of LE analyzing cell phone data of the surviving roommates. Could they have been texting each other while all of this was going on? I believe BF's bedroom is just below Xana's. So, unless she had earbuds in, she likely heard some movement above. Just another one of my theories. If the two roommates were, indeed, texting each other, BF was probably more afraid than DM because her room is on the ground floor with windows that could easily be accessed by the suspect. They didn't know if he was still in the house or had already left.

1674151590486.png
 
During one of my Google searches in this case (that would make me look suspicious if I ever did anything bad!) I looked up places to hide a knife and one of the first answers was...in a tree! Like fairly high up, deep at the base of a branch where it joins the tree. I agree with @SRWCF that it will probably be found by accident years from now. I wonder if anyone's ever done a plea deal (LWOP; no death penalty) to give up the location of a weapon?
Interesting. And if the knife was hidden up high enough where nobody could see it, the tree could easily grow around it after years and conceal the weapon altogether. Genius!
 
This is such a good point! Thank you! Can you imagine LE coming in with a warrant and leaving with the carpet torn off the floor and every item of clothing / linen in his apartment? That seems like a massive violation of rights as established in search warrants and probable cause, IMO.
I was impressed with the references within the Application for Search Warrant that spoke to standards of least intrusive search, even with regard to digital data. I don't have a page so better post the whole link

 
He’s just an idiot who thought they’d never find him I think. It’s remarkable, how someone who studied things like this, scouted the house, and planned for months, did this.

I think he knew he was done when he left the sheath, and tried to cover it up. But he made more mistakes, and forgot items.

Idiot.
Or found out studying is not the same as doing…
 
DO we know it was a fabric tag that had been sewn onto the mask and not the cardboard tag that said Dickies that would be tethered to the mask next to the price tag? I had been picturing the hanging tag with brand name.
No, we don’t. It says: “1 Walmart receipt with one Dickies tag.” That’s all that was shared.
 
Roads had been blocked off near BK's apartment the night of the murders, due to a hit and run. Despite the police presence and roads blocked, BK still felt he had to go out that night and commit the murders. For BK to take that chance, being rerouted, not a direct path to the crime scene, drive past police and paramedics... makes a person wonder, it sort of tells me he had to do it that night... MOO.

 
Does anybody remember - there was something about BK having had a conversation with another student about local hiking trails? I can’t remember if he was asking about a specific place? Would be interesting to look at how that place (if a specific place or area was mentioned) fits into his route on the day of/after the murders.
 
During one of my Google searches in this case (that would make me look suspicious if I ever did anything bad!) I looked up places to hide a knife and one of the first answers was...in a tree! Like fairly high up, deep at the base of a branch where it joins the tree. I agree with @SRWCF that it will probably be found by accident years from now. I wonder if anyone's ever done a plea deal (LWOP; no death penalty) to give up the location of a weapon?
That's interesting, considering his whereabouts the following day.
Then again...
The defense could easily say it's his usual habit to go hiking.
 
Regarding the discussion of him not owning sheets and towels.

The search warrant was pretty specific. It did not direct anyone to seize "sheets and towels". They took certain bedding pieces (or cuttings) that had stains or evidently tested presumptive for blood.

You can't just go in and take items outside the scope of the warrant.

The assumption he had no sheets or towels is growing wings here when we have absolutely no idea what was left in his apartment vs what was legally seized in compliance with the search warrant.

JMO

That's probably my fault. If it's true that they could take samples from pillows (are pillows mentioned in the search warrant? I need to go check), they could take samples from towels (and should have). I guess DNA evidence was not the goal, just blood stains? That's too bad.

I did realize in the middle of the night that it's likely that there are sealed warrants still outstanding. The warrant we're discussing was filed on Dec 29 and executed on Dec 30, IIRC.

I spent yesterday moaning about the sink trap, but it occurred to me that is quite intrusive and detrimental to the property owner (WSU) and would need more legal reasoning to accomplish.

I hope and pray they have gone back in and done that. No hurry, as BK isn't going back there any time soon.

If anyone has a link to the original warrant (not the results), I'd appreciate it.
 
Or it could be that you guys want to give this guy a lot more credit than he deserves.....?

I know a few people with PhDs that can barely get themselves around a city without getting flustered. Or can't organize an event. Or are really good at talking about what they studied but struggle when applying the work.

A lot of the 'Maybe Bryan didn't do it!' it folk (not saying you) base their entire theories on the redemption genius stories they love seeing in movies. They just don't like the ending of this one.
I agree with you. I know some of those too. He’s just a two bit criminal of the west kind.
 
I know nothing about this really, but I'm of the impression that specialist investigators would be able to trace a tag, if it has been cut off a piece of clothing like a balaclava, back to the item it was removed from, the batch and possibly even which outlet it was purchased from. MOO
I agree. We could even do it. All anyone would have to do is google the number on the barcode or any style number that comes up and you'll find it.
 
I think the question "why didn't you call the police?" is likely to come up on cross, so the prosecutor will get there first. "Why didn't you check on your roommates?" "Why did you wait so long...?" --the same stuff that comes up in the media and on here.

I dread this poor young woman having to testify, but IMO it will be necessary. I hope, if it comes to trial, the defense is sensitive in their cross-examination. If they rake her over the coals, they will be alienating the jury big time. MOO.
 
This is such a good point! Thank you! Can you imagine LE coming in with a warrant and leaving with the carpet torn off the floor and every item of clothing / linen in his apartment? That seems like a massive violation of rights as established in search warrants and probable cause, IMO.
Maybe but if they did find victims blood, they will go back and get that plumbing. It’s happened in other cases.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
96
Guests online
3,681
Total visitors
3,777

Forum statistics

Threads
592,117
Messages
17,963,503
Members
228,687
Latest member
Pabo1998
Back
Top