Sorry to hear that.
I thought they used the word informative but I have possibly misheard it. I also thought they said that Nicola wouldn’t have been expected to speak during the Teams meeting. I just wondered if the meeting could have been connected to any possible pending investigation. She had a meeting with her boss the night before - could there have been disciplinary action pending. My opinion only.
No they did confirm it was an informative session and that is why it wasn’t unusual for her mic and video to be off.
It's not happening in every area, but there is a drive to have more targeted support for MH related 999/111 calls. So a 'mini team' visit in a paramedic car, who can assess, signpost, refer etc rather than just conveying distressed person to a&e to wait for assessment.
It was dismissed by the police, quite emphatically from memory. Unless the police are lying (I don't see that could be the case on this point), then the call was more of an update call, and not one of the Silicon Valley mass lay off type of call, just a run of the mill boring call. In Financial Services, there is a whole heap of compliance required, especially when recommending financial products to consumers. It sounded like the call was more in line with that, from how I heard it.
Slightly off topic but I hope you’re in a better place now X
We don’t know if it was NB or PA who was being investigated
I didn't know that, thank you. Its good to see that sort of stuff happening, its needed. Please ignore my previous comment, which was based on experience a little while ago.
They just confirmed that it was a call that she didnt need to take an active part in, hence the muting of the call.
There’s the crisis team.
Or possibly both. When I watched the interview and he was speaking about her going down (assume to the kitchen) and then him going down and some of the other things he said, it almost sounded like they were living together but separately if that makes sense.
I'm sure I remember the detective mentioning that the call wasn't bad news, or anything other than a routine call. Its been a long day though, my mind may be playing tricks. Can anybody remember ?
I think its got to be really serious for that though? Like a tiny percentage of cases, and likely ones known the services already?
Unless there is obvious abuse, children aren't taken off parents that quickly. Parents are given lots of chances to improve their behaviour
They gave absolutely not the slightest hint that this was a concern in any of the other pressers. Even today vulnerabilities could have meant anything. Or nothing since we're not privy to their internal SPECIFIC criteria. I think it was about to be leaked, not by them. They couldn't just drop it without supporting evidence- their visit on 10th. They're going to be attacked whatever they do but they're extraordinarily professional so I doubt it will affect their investigation.
