No armchair quarterback has ever won a real football game, and the real game is all that counts.
I have said to more than one person in my office, if all I want is someone who can criticize and second guess the actions of others in retrospect I can get someone to do that off the street for minimum wage. The criticism may be valid and the hindsight might be accurate, there's just no value there so I don't have any use for it.
I know (Mayor) Cashell, in the sense that his grandkids and my daughter attended the same elementary school so we would say hello to each other at school functions, and he's a totally decent fellow. My BIL is a uniformed LE officer here in Reno (who was part of the team in the field where Brianna was found). The critical comments I read all seem to be based on the assumption that the political and LE organizations don't care about this crime, and I know that's not the case. So I just ignore those uneducated rants.
The police have to work within certain parameters. If the first rape this filth committed was his first offense ever, there would have been no DNA on file even if the entire backlog had been processed already. The police must operate within the law to catch a criminal operating outside the law. It's a difficult task, when done correctly nobody notices but if there's a perception you made a mistake everyone's a critic. They have my admiration.
The money to process the DNA samples was supposed to be paid by the very individuals that made the testing necessary in the first place - convicted sex offenders. How did they escape punishment for not paying what they were ordered to? I'm sure it was a mistake in the way the law was implemented. On the other hand, I can just see the sob stories that would hit the paper about some poor misunderstood flasher who was forced back to prison after his release for failing to pay for his forced DNA testing, just like I see the sob storeis about the poor 3 strikes criminal who was sent to prison for stealing a piece of pizza. Can't have it both ways - if you want to reduce crime, you've got to punish criminals.
Ultimately, as always, the citizens of Reno paid for it. I look at it this way: to raise the $150,000 needed by public donation cost the public $150,000. To do it via that tax system would have cost considerably more due to governmental inefficiency. It's our money either way - unless you're one of those people that does not understand that things are not free because the government pays for them.