Nonni Brenda
Georgia girl
- Joined
- Jan 9, 2009
- Messages
- 2,069
- Reaction score
- 31
It is my opinion that Ronald Cummings could come to regret the filing of this motion.
The filing of a collateral attack by Mr. Cummings on the sentence from his negotiated plea agreement could be grounds for the State to rethink their initial willingness to offer such generous terms.
First, the State could claim that the Motion in itself constitutes a substantial breach of his plea agreement, therefore rendering it null and void. He could then face 30 years.
Alternatively, the State could simply press the "Easy Button", and stipulate (agree) that Ron’s motion be granted. The court would then nullify the prior sentence pursuant to the plea agreement, and the State would be granted a “redo” – a Mulligan so to speak. Ron could be resentenced entirely, being forced to deal with an ASA who probably would not be so willing to give him the break he got the first go round.
So Papa, could they then go back and add the cases they droped charges on, back into the mix and try him for all original cases? And now he has pizzed them off on top of that. What a great thought!:great: