shgrbkr
New Member
- Joined
- Oct 5, 2008
- Messages
- 829
- Reaction score
- 3
Here's what I don't understand about this whole thing Baez brought up about the dead pets:
JB contention is that KC had nothing to do with Caylee's death or the disposal of the body. So WHY would the DT themselves bring up all this stuff about family habits in how they bury their pets, along with saying aloud in court that KC was a part of this tradition and may have in fact took an active role in it?? JB was NOT putting forth anything other than KC herself may have learned this method of burial from her family! This does not distance KC from the disposal of Caylee's body, but in fact puts her much much closer to it. IMO.
I have not read thru this whole thread to see if this has been brought up, too busy, but I just had to get this off my chest. It just does NOT make sense.
JB contention is that KC had nothing to do with Caylee's death or the disposal of the body. So WHY would the DT themselves bring up all this stuff about family habits in how they bury their pets, along with saying aloud in court that KC was a part of this tradition and may have in fact took an active role in it?? JB was NOT putting forth anything other than KC herself may have learned this method of burial from her family! This does not distance KC from the disposal of Caylee's body, but in fact puts her much much closer to it. IMO.
I have not read thru this whole thread to see if this has been brought up, too busy, but I just had to get this off my chest. It just does NOT make sense.