2011.07.17 Casey Released From Jail

[The Farm]

the TOP talent agency in the US

http://www.caa.com/

Ever seen the show Entourage? The character Ari Gold is based on real life mega-agent Ari Emanuel (brother of Rahm) and CAA has the tops stars in Hollywood on its roster.

But Casey has no talent. All she is is a child murderer.

 

[Quiche]

the TOP talent agency in the US

http://www.caa.com/

Ever seen the show Entourage? The character Ari Gold is based on real life mega-agent Ari Emanuel (brother of Rahm) and CAA has the tops stars in Hollywood on its roster.

There could be a lot of backlash from their clients-- Hollywood paid attention to the trial, and didn't like the outcome, imo.

 

[HRCODEPINK]

Open one.

I thought we weren't allowed to open new threads. But it looks like someone did already, so that's good.

Thanks for the clarification. I myself was surprised to know the State knew there had been no 84 searches, and pressed the point anyway. Really hope your daughter is OK!

Thank you!! She is doing much better now!

 

[Solange82200]

Thanks for the clarification. I myself was surprised to know the State knew there had been no 84 searches, and pressed the point anyway. Really hope your daughter is OK!

I don't think that is 100 percent true. It says in another thread here about this issue that the Bradley guy figured out the error after the prosecution rested. Remember at trial Jose told the judge that they had received info that the 84 searches were actually 1, and wanted the Judge to order the SA to tell the jury of the mistake, and LDB said basically "they can point it out in closing", and the judge agreed. I really doubt it was purposely hidden or presented wrong by the SA, and regardless, one time searching How to Make Chloroform is enough for me.

 

[Ricki]

[ame="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Creative_Artists_Agency"]Creative Artists Agency - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia@@AMEPARAM@@/wiki/File:Creative_Artists_Agency_logo.svg" class="image" title="Icelogo"><img alt="Icelogo" src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/3/3e/Creative_Artists_Agency_logo.svg/200px-Creative_Artists_Agency_logo.svg.png"@@AMEPARAM@@commons/thumb/3/3e/Creative_Artists_Agency_logo.svg/200px-Creative_Artists_Agency_logo.svg.png[/ame]

Interesting on who employs the agents.
CAA agents employed by the William Morris Agency

Isn't this the agency that turned JB down?

 

[scorekeeper]

:blushing: It was that or Dead Rattlesnake - my two favorite characters to come out of this story. I went with the imaginary one. :crazy:

Wonder why the dead/smelly squirrel wasn't on the "circle" of imaginary friends of FCA???????

:floorlaugh::floorlaugh::floorlaugh::floorlaugh:

 

[Quiche]

Creative Artists Agency - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Interesting on who employs the agents.
CAA agents employed by the William Morris Agency

Isn't this the agency that turned JB down?

They WERE from William Morris... they struck out on their own. irrc

eta: However, it's a small community, really-- they all talk to one another. mo

 

[scarlett_hues]

There could be a lot of backlash from their clients-- Hollywood paid attention to the trial, and didn't like the outcome, imo.

Doesn't matter, IMO, to like of H-Wood agents.

Money talk.. casey walks..

Such a shame..

 

[Shelby1]

I don't think that is 100 percent true. It says in another thread here about this issue that the Bradley guy figured out the error after the prosecution rested. Remember at trial Jose told the judge that they had received info that the 84 searches were actually 1, and wanted the Judge to order the SA to tell the jury of the mistake, and LDB said basically "they can point it out in closing", and the judge agreed. I really doubt it was purposely hidden or presented wrong by the SA, and regardless, one time searching How to Make Chloroform is enough for me.

I agree, 1 search is probably enough for most anyone, but that's not the problem.

HRCODEPINK explains it well here, if you haven't read it yet.

[ame="http://www.websleuths.com/forums/showpost.php?p=6926921&postcount=2357"]Websleuths Crime Sleuthing Community - View Single Post - 2011.07.17 Casey Released From Jail[/ame]

 

[IfIMay]

I'm not saying the case in any way "hinged" on the search count.

I'm saying this is troublesome because it's the second time this type of situation has occurred involving Mr. Ashton.

Like I stated above. I believe he's a good lawyer and a stand up guy. I don't understand why he would let this happen twice.

Why are you jumping on Mr. Ashton? LDB was in charge of that evidence. She did the cross. I don't know what to think of it other than the information was misunderstood. I don't see any conspiracy to defraud.

 

[scarlett_hues]

The NG was bad enough.. the fact that she got what she wanted.. A life without Caylee

But NOW she's going to be a millionaire, many times over, makes me absolutely SICK.. physically sick to my stomach. (and that's the truth, whether this rumor is true or not)

 

[Quiche]

Doesn't matter, IMO, to like of H-Wood agents.

Money talk.. casey walks..

Such a shame..

I can see KC with a strip mall agent, but not at CAA-- I don't think she has enough prospects. Unless, of course, she's at CAA to negotiate something with one of their clients, I think that's more probable. But, ick.

 

[smart blonde]

Who is CAA?

What is CAA?

What's CAA?

The biggest talent agency in California.
Make that the United States.

I have dealt with their agents in the past, while selling real estate to various buyers (Professional Golfer Brandi Burton, for one). The agents I dealt with were complete sharks. Cut-throat. I don't mean that as an insult, either.

They know their stuff. Powerful and influential, to put it mildly.

 

[Sistah Sleuth]

Casey Anthony: Cursed with Freedom!


http://www.youtube.com/lancescurv#p/u/22/3ENGjhFNmx0

 

[Quiche]

The biggest talent agency in California.
Make that the United States.

I have dealt with their agents in the past, while selling real estate to various buyers (Professional Golfer Brandi Burton, for one). The agents I dealt with were complete sharks. Cut-throat. I don't mean that as an insult, either.

They know their stuff. Powerful and influential, to put it mildly.

They are international. From their Wiki page: CAA has offices in Los Angeles, New York City, Chicago, Nashville, London, Beijing, St. Louis, Calgary and Stockholm.

 

[Shelby1]

Why are you jumping on Mr. Ashton? LDB was in charge of that evidence. She did the cross. I don't know what to think of it other than the information was misunderstood. I don't see any conspiracy to defraud.

I'm not "jumping on" Mr. Ashton.

I'm wondering why this same scenario has happened twice in cases that he is involved with. With the same judge.

 

[Americka]

I'm not saying the case in any way "hinged" on the search count.

I'm saying this is troublesome because it's the second time this type of situation has occurred involving Mr. Ashton.

Like I stated above. I believe he's a good lawyer and a stand up guy. I don't understand why he would let this happen twice.

What type of situation? Are you referring to the suppression of evidence in Florida v Huggins? Because that isn't remotely what happened in this situation. This wasn't about suppression - in was about interpretation.

 

[Shelby1]

What type of situation? Are you referring to the suppression of evidence in Florida v Huggins? Because that isn't remotely what happened in this situation. This wasn't about suppression - in was about interpretation.

I'm not explaining myself well, obviously.

Read here to see what I'm trying to say:

[ame="http://www.websleuths.com/forums/showpost.php?p=6926921&postcount=2357"]Websleuths Crime Sleuthing Community - View Single Post - 2011.07.17 Casey Released From Jail[/ame]


Also, a thread has been made so we can discuss:

[ame="http://www.websleuths.com/forums/showthread.php?t=144987"]Software designer says Casey Anthony prosecution data was wrong - Websleuths Crime Sleuthing Community[/ame]

 

[legalmania]

@@@I would start here:

"This ruling is an extension of Mooney v. Holohan, 294 U. S. 103, 294 U. S. 112, where the Court ruled on what nondisclosure by a prosecutor violates due process:

"It is a requirement that cannot be deemed to be satisfied by mere notice and hearing if a state has contrived a conviction through the pretense of a trial which, in truth, is but used as a means of depriving a defendant of liberty through a deliberate deception of court and jury by the presentation of testimony known to be perjured. Such a contrivance by a state to procure the conviction and imprisonment of a defendant is as inconsistent with the rudimentary demands of justice as is the obtaining of a like result by intimidation."

@@@And read to at least here:

"There is considerable doubt as to how much good Boblit's undisclosed confession would have done Brady if it had been before the jury. It clearly implicated Brady as being the one who wanted to strangle the victim, Brooks. Boblit, according to this statement, also favored killing him, but he wanted to do it by shooting. We cannot put ourselves in the place of the jury, and assume what their views would have been as to whether it did or did not matter whether it was Brady's hands or Boblit's hands that twisted the shirt about the victim's neck. . . . t would be 'too dogmatic' for us to say that the jury would not have attached any significance to this evidence in considering the punishment of the defendant Brady."

"Not without some doubt, we conclude that the withholding of this particular confession of Boblit's was prejudicial to the defendant Brady. . . . "[/quote]


respectfully snipped;

Maybe I'm not understanding that case is for someone seeking a new trial. Casey was acquitted. She cannot be retried according to the fifth amendment of the constitution. On the three murder counts.

 

[SMK]

I'm not "jumping on" Mr. Ashton.

I'm wondering why this same scenario has happened twice in cases that he is involved with. With the same judge.

I posted this on the other thread, dedicated to the 84 searches, and will now only post about it on that thread, but it really is a very big deal:

I was very shocked and angry to find that the prosecution out and out lied about the 84 searches, with full knowledge that they were lying. It IS huge, and I have seen this story now in the New York Times, on MSNBC, and on In Session. Had she been convicted, experts say, the conviction may have been overturned due to this. So much for the prosecution being honest:

Expert: I Warned Prosecutors Casey Anthony Didn’t Do 84 ‘Chloroform’ Word Searches
Casey Anthony didn’t do 84 searches for the word “chloroform” and prosecutors didn’t correct the error, a computer expert says.

John Bradley, who designed the CacheBack software used to support the 84-search assertion, now says Anthony visited the suspect website only once, the New York Times reports.The website, sci-spot.com, gave information about the use of chloroform in the 1800s.

Bradley redesigned CacheBack after he testified for the prosecution and learned police used a different software in 2008 that found Anthony had visited the website only once.

Bradley says he notified prosecutor Linda Drane Burdick and sheriff’s police when he learned of the error, but jurors were never told about it. One of the defense lawyers, Cheney Mason, says they were never told either. “If in fact this is true, and the prosecution concealed this new information, it is more than shame on them. It is outrageous,” he told the Times.

http://www.abajournal.com/news/artic...hloroform_wor/