For the record, I believe in innocent until proven guilty before a court of law.
And I also believe in the right to free speech, which is protected in the charter as well.
Great. We're 100 percent in agreement, then.
For the record, I believe in innocent until proven guilty before a court of law.
And I also believe in the right to free speech, which is protected in the charter as well.
As far as conviction goes... I worry... The way I look at this is all the evidence we know of so far, can be explained away.. Giving reasonable doubt.. Murder one needs beyond a reasonable doubt.. So IF DM's prints were not on or in Tims truck, the prosecutor will have a tough time.. IMO... If Dellen has high priced seasoned lawyer, he/she won't have a problem creating reasonable doubt (if DM's prints are not found in or on Tims truck)..
Another right afforded to all is the right to agree to disagree.
As far as conviction goes... I worry... The way I look at this is all the evidence we know of so far, can be explained away.. Giving reasonable doubt.. Murder one needs beyond a reasonable doubt.. So IF DM's prints were not on or in Tims truck, the prosecutor will have a tough time.. IMO... If Dellen has high priced seasoned lawyer, he/she won't have a problem creating reasonable doubt (if DM's prints are not found in or on Tims truck)..
Im sure we only know like 5 percent of what the police know , we speculate , the policehave looked at the facebooks , gaming sites , talked to their friends, tracked their cell phones and gps ..these police are very good at what they do ..we do know there was atleast 1 or 2 other people involved , surely the night of or days following tims abduction , these guys talked to others involved ,yet no arrests , strikes me as wierd ,they had to work out what to do with tims dodge ,
alot happened that night , see truck , test drive,get from from ancaster to cambridge , kill tim , burn tim , get rid of truck , i would be in panic mode for sure ..
bbmhi wendy , reasonable doubt yes , wethe people , know what we ve been told , rest is speculation period . u need alot more to go to a jury , if there was a gun ,, where is it , who used it , , since burning a body rids of so much evedence , i can only assume they found tims wedding ring .
this is going to be an expensive court case , alot ot time , a jury and alot of presscoverage so crown better get it right ... like the kennedy case, we re only going to know what we get told ....if some 1 ever wanted to write a true crime book ,,,this is the case( Ann Rule )
Just because ive posted a pic of myself with a bloody eye doesnt make me a killer ,, just because i played a dexter like person in a video game doesnt make me a killer ,,,crown has to put facts before a jury , if im on that jury u better sell me , if ur chargein these guys with murder prove they did it , if there is still 1 or 2 missing suspects , in my opinion ,they have no case and no use taking to court .. if you were on jury . truly with what u know are the facts ..whatn would you do
could be the folks on the ''don't contact/nor publicize'' list are very important to the Crown's case....and we just won't know til trial.:truce:
If there are no prints found in TB's truck, the prosecutor could argue that they had plenty of time to wipe the truck clean. The truck was in their possession for days, they even had time to remove the seats. Not sure how you can explain away how TB is dead? Explain how his remains were found on DM's the farm? Burned? Explain how SB saw DM and MS drive away with her husband?
Friends "could have" set DM up.. Quite easily.. If DM was the kind of person to say "sure use anything you need" if asked to lend something out.
No, can't explain away Tim is dead, but who done it, is the real question, who was really there and who wasn't.
The remains and every other piece of evidence in this investigation lead directly to DM... I find that odd! If I am going to murder someone or be involved in murdering someone, I would not have the evidence point directly to me.
I am not saying I believe DM is innocent, I am looking at the evidence and the possibility of reasonable doubt... .
right now their accessories to a crime period ..
4 people saying others did it .
bbm
TB would not have been identified from a piece of jewelry.
Burn victims identified by DNA in maggots
Identification of a charred corpse through dental records
Genetic investigation of modern burned corpses
maybe we're framing the hangar/contract question incorrectly.
Hypothetically, when DM and AS were discussing the hangar, and DM was asking for contracts, he may have been asking for a good reason to clear out the hanger. in DM's mind, there's no point in clearing it out if there are no contracts, but AS knows he needs a givclean hangar to be tours to be able to get the contracts.
Interesting reading! The third link relates to DNA testing of cremated remains. The study examined cremated remains where the remaining bone fragments had been ground (as is routine). What they found is that they could not make reliable DNA matches on these cremated remains - a mixture of ash and ground bone.
If in fact the incinerator was used to dispose of the body the end result would have been ash and bone fragments. If the bone fragments were not ground up as is done in a crematorium they could have provided the needed DNA material for testing (bone marrow).
This could be how TB's remains were identified.
Mr. Sharif and the Millardair team were told that Wayne had died of a brain aneurysm. Within days, employees were laid off and Dellen moved quickly to begin liquidating assets. In February, Millardair requested cancellation of the Transport Canada certificate executives had worked hard to obtain.
Read more: http://kitchener.ctvnews.ca/inciner...cused-in-bosma-murder-1.1284332#ixzz2V49Or0Y5A company that supplied Millard Air with materials tells CTV News the charter air service stopped taking orders last week – the same week police say Bosma was killed by Millard and unknown accomplices.