Archangel7
Verified Law Enforcement
- Joined
- May 15, 2013
- Messages
- 1,420
- Reaction score
- 16
AA, do you think the discussions you presume have occurred included both accuseds' lawyers, the prosecutor and possibly the Judge? (MS' next court date is also Sept 12.) So one set of discussions or two?
I guess how it goes down until the 12th is anybody's guess. We have nothing for clues od disclosure or current status to go by. What I wonder, and maybe someone here will have a better idea, is if there were a dealmaking suspect #3, how does this individual (or more than one) fit in to the pre-trial as I imagine their information would form a big part of disclosure?
Preliminary meetings, preliminary inquires, etc. wouldn' need a Judge. Simple discovery given to accused's lawyer and the Crown gets to se for the cirst time what the accused lawyer has available to put forth. Then both sides have a realization, and pleas are talked about, possibility of reducing charges or no quarter is offered.
After all of the above, both go before the Judge in a very informal "trial" where each presents and the Judge listens and offers suggestions based on law and what he will allow to be tried, any deals he would or would not approve and what he will allow to be plead.
If the Criminal Justice System Process is followed( which is certain to be done) this is where we should be(of course Judicial Pretrial hasn't happened however it should be next after date setting meeting Sept. 12th.
However, it is possible for DM to enter a guilty plea anytime from now up to and during trial which would slightly change the process obviously.
Some simply wait until a jury is seated, look them over and figure uh oh, the gigs up and plead guilty.