Yes. In my theory - its not even human access - its programmatic access. i.e. the website talking to paypal.
The wonderful Tortoise has helped jog something in my head that I should have thought of before. Here is the theory We know that Dan was granted...
Incidentally it has been great to delve into the Packham case by comparison (South Africa) There you have a Judge who is nobodies fool, and...
Completely agree That is why the defence spent 130K on some speculative IP stuff. You only need a couple of jurors to buy into it. One of the...
Yes - deleting quickbooks and backdating need to seen together It could have worked, if he had managed it. No one would know that he didn't...
This is also why the backdating proves guilt Backdating couldn't serve any purpose against Joey himself.
It would be up to the executors of Joey's estate - named in his will. I am not sure if what happens if you die intestate in Cali, but I assume...
Sadly its not this simple because in law we have both the legal & equitable position So personally I would have done it PMs way - but in a...
Exactly - but this is precisely where the dead eyed High Court Judge of my day would tear counsel a new one. You can't come to court with a...
I agree, and I think it points to confusion around the overall BARD standard in criminal trials, vs evidential proof. BARD is simply the question...
Agreed - but from the point of view of the defence - why on earth do they not blow the prosecution case wide open with the PAX records if DK...
IMO Joey's estate could have sued Dan to account for the proceeds of sale.
Thanks Bobcat None of this is particularly surprising from a legal standpoint. e.g changing the merchant account on the website was an obvious...
Agreed But why don't the defence produce one - seeing as it would slay the Prosecution case? This is the easiest thing in the world to do, and...
It could be used as a circumstantial point yes But I am still waiting for one fact that places him in Cali, whereas we have multiple evidential...
