This was a suggestion made by ST. It's hardly been proven to be a fact. (Kolar EVEN refutes it.)
Besides that, if one takes a step back and analyzes the "contaminated clippers suggestion", one should wonder how it came to be that the unknown, consistent, male DNA profiles isolated from each hand revealed a differing # of detected loci.
Thank you. I welcome your thoughts regarding my opinions.
For clarification purposes, and if Im muddying the water, not my intent. It is true that the trace DNA under JBs nails was not linked to the 8 preceding autopsies in the coroners office, so its assumed that the nail clippers were not part of any contamination. However, the DNA was so tiny, the techs couldnt tell if it were from blood or skin cells. Fast forward to PRs interviews, she couldnt say when JB last bathed or when she last washed her hands.
So while one can be correct that something could be from a nefarious source, who knows where it came from and whether it is relevant or not.
The other item Ill mention then move on from is that I also read that Kolar does mention reviewing past medical treatment of JB, and one should acknowledge they had some reports written by Detective JH from her verbal interviews with the staff at Dr. Bs office and from Dr. B himself. They also had Michigan doctor medical records obtained by one of the Rs investigators (EA), who was hired by the H law firm. Those records, from the Michigan doctors office, were allegedly given to the BPD/DAs office.
What we dont know is whether what Kolar reviewed were the actual written records from a Colorado doctor, which could have been subpoenaed by the GJ. Unspecified, unknown.
Another interesting discrepancy between Kolar and ST merits mentioning. The therapist visit did not ring a bell with Kolar, so its a question whether JB saw a therapist or not. In STs book he states that when Detective G phoned a therapist who we were told had seen JB, he was told to speak to the parents attorneys. No subsequent follow-up is listed, but its doubtful that if the therapist hearsay is true that they received permission, or they would have written a report.
Kolar had no report on a therapist to review; so, here again one chooses which source makes most sense Kolar or ST.
There were supposedly 40,000 pages of documentation of evidence in this case. Kolar states in one interview after our leader TG says something about Kolar seeing
all the evidence something to the effect I didnt review it
all. I respect Kolar's humility.
Personally I make no pretense of knowing this case the way our long-time posters here do. And again a repeated caveat, take from this info what you will.
I also frequently operate on hunches.