With the utmost respect !
You have got to be kidding!!!
no, not kidding, neither one has been arrested or named as suspects. In Australia we have that thing about accessory before and after the fact.
With the utmost respect !
You have got to be kidding!!!
Defence in my opinion doesn't sound very confident in what they are putting forward, very nervous and unsure. Im finding this pivotal this whole legal discussion taking place. I feel unexpectedly sick and nervous.
marly are you saying maybe no defence witnesses ??????????????
Defence in my opinion doesn't sound very confident in what they are putting forward, very nervous and unsure. Im finding this pivotal this whole legal discussion taking place. I feel unexpectedly sick and nervous.
it is not unusual for the Defence to bring this matter to the courts attention at this point in a trial. This is not an exception. it is a tactic..
it is a matter to be decided if .. IF the trial for murder should progress.. the defence will say. well. there isn't enough to claim its murder.. the prosecution will say, there is..
Don't sweat, this may be a matter of course at this stage and might come from either or both sides, to determine what the defence must prove. There are different defences that can be made for murder and manslaughter. Sentence for manslaughter (an unlawful killing) can still be up to life.
The police must prove the accused committed each offence in an unlawful killing to my understanding. Has that been adduced beyond a reasonable doubt?
Thanks PrimeSuspect!
So it's possible that evidence that was already in the public domain (affidavits and other documents at bail hearings) and those to do with financials etc could have been disclosed in those sessions?
When a verdict is reached and after a sentence is handed down (if defendant guilty) are the transcripts or logs of those sessions published too?
Just curious.
The leaves and the blood are the two key pieces of evidence IMO that point directly at GBC's guilt. All the defence team need to do is to present an explanation for each, to raise enough doubt in the jurors mind, to water down their significance.
Not feeling as confident about this as I was earlier.
BJ, where you come from, how do the courts determine manslaughter?