Agreed! And regarding the "swimwear" for women- wetsuits are hot! (and I don't mean sexy) unless you are in the water, in which case, they keep you comfortable. I have a sleeveless one for my own pool, which is freezing, because it's too expensive to heat it.Also (i know im long winded lol) The most strict religions in America where women must be covered and submissive reminds me of some other place that America is at war with and most Americans are in the middle of(and funding) this war of completely opposite religions, my son has wanted to be in tbe air force since he was 6, he is 15 now, I refuse to let my son die for some wars, which I'm sure will be more by the time he is 18, that I have no idea is the purpose at this point, no clue, they tell the parents they died fighting for their country. God bless the spouses children and parents!
I just have lost the point of all this i guess, refer to my tag, I may never understand.
I understand this impulse. The contradiction is newsworthy. That dissimulation must be called out. But we shouldnt stray far from focusing on, extending help to, and seeking to be sensitive to the survivors and using these cases educationally to better protect other children.
As a survivor of childhood sexual abuse, I can say with some authority that no one should take an ounce of joy in these revelations and accusations. This is not a political issue, even if people including abusers themselves have hypocritically used it as one.
This is not the time for giddiness or gloating. Child sexual abuse is tragic and traumatic for its survivors and that is where the bulk of the focus should always be.
When a child is sexually abused, it breaks bonds of trust. It is a violation of the sovereignty of the self and ones zone of physical intimacy. It is an action of developmental exploitation. It is a spiritual act of violence that attacks not only the body but also the mind.
It can take decades, or even a lifetime, to recover if recovery is even emotionally available for the survivor.
I'm not going to watch that of interview. I don't need a lecture from Megyn and the Duggars about how this was a private, family tragedy that they handled well which ha turned into a liberal witch hunt.
I am curious to see what they say but I have to tell you I did find it refreshing to see them all take responsibility and not try and shirk what happened.
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/megyn-kelly-josh-duggar-media
Say what? How does the Freedom of Information Act become LE leaking JD's juvenile police records? And JD wasn't a juvenile in 2006. Hmm, is this a preview of Ms. Kelly's mindset for the upcoming interview? Short answer - probably.
And why isn't grown up Josh a part of the interview? What 27 year-old lets his mommy and daddy talk for him? Sheesh.
And this asinine statement from Duggar supporter Mike Huckabee:
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/mike-huckabee-transgender-shower-girls
By that twisted logic he might as well have said he should have had a leg amputated in order to park closer to the gym. From under what rock do these people come?
They called a teenager's repeated sexual assaults of girls as young as 5 years old as 'mistakes'. They kept the person who assaulted their daughters under their roof, without receiving any sort of appropriate counseling.
I think you're downplaying the severity of what he did, and cutting his family a lot of slack.
They called a teenager's repeated sexual assaults of girls as young as 5 years old as 'mistakes'. They kept the person who assaulted their daughters under their roof, without receiving any sort of appropriate counseling.
I think you're downplaying the severity of what he did, and cutting his family a lot of slack.
They called a teenager's repeated sexual assaults of girls as young as 5 years old as 'mistakes'. They kept the person who assaulted their daughters under their roof, without receiving any sort of appropriate counseling.
I think you're downplaying the severity of what he did, and cutting his family a lot of slack.
Agree. They did everything they could to minimize, cover up, and ensure that there was no appropriate consequences for their son and no appropriate counseling for either their son or their daughters. How is that taking responsibility?
Sent from my KFJWI using Tapatalk
I have the report listed earlier that states sex offenders start about age 14.
What if your neighbor 14 year old boy did that to your five year old? A mistake? No outlet?
I don't know what counseling they had or didn't. All we know is what was reported to the media not the whole truth most likely.
They did not come out and try to sugar coat it or make it seem false or like it was not bad. They admitted that it was true. That is more than most do these days.
I just am not sure what people want from this. He was 14 and committed a horrible act but so far nothing since then. And the statute of limitations is run out for anything from the past. The victims have forgiven him. He has moved on.. Granted, He has not made it easier for himself trying to be the moral compass for people but I see that often.
People who are "reformed" often are the worst finger pointers.
I am still weighing all this out. I just don't know what people want from here. He lost his job, the family lost the show, There are no charges to be had and I will bet a million dollars when this came out people went searching for things that could have happened any time in the last 10 years.