canadianwhitedove
New Member
- Joined
- May 3, 2009
- Messages
- 74
- Reaction score
- 0
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Actually, very few people are declaring that they think Steven is definitely innocent....just that he shouldn't have been convicted based on the evidence presented at trial.
Brendan Dassey did not come up with any story. Not one piece of credible information was volunteered by him...the police fed it to him and got him to agree.
"If he'd just kept his mouth shut?" Seriously? This was a learning disabled child who thought if he said what they wanted to hear he could be back at school in order to hand in a project.
If anything's surprising it's that anyone could watch that documentry and come away thinking that Brendan Dassey "confessed". He really didn't.
I am just starting episode 4 and I am in a state of shock. I have looking at the body language of LE mainly as well as that Kratz person. They sure were nervous when being questioned by the civil attorneys. I just can't get over the feeling so far, that Teresa (of no value) was worth the $35M (sacrifice) to implicate Avery and keep those liable out of jail. LE seems very suspect so far in the way it has been presented. I may change my mind as I continue to watch.
I'll admit by episode 10...I never finished the doc.
I cheated and googled the case..
I kept thinking there would be a happy ending.....as it stands...they are both still locked up.
I just watched Brendan's lawyer gear up for the media with this slimey bravado. OMG! I am now watching his investigator, Kelley, have Brendon look at this form that obviously Brendan does not understand. He tells Brendon if he's not sorry, then he can't help him. Brendan says he didn't do anything! OMG! This is horrific. Beyond horrific. This kid is obviously diminished capacity with an extremely low IQ. His attorney obviously has an agenda to get notoriety and be elected to something down the road. IMO.
This is hard to watch as I yell at my iPad. Does this really happen? WTH? I am not a lawyer, but none of this seems right at all. Teresa's family deserves the truth and so far, I don't think I am seeing anything truthful at all. IMO
she appears to be one of the few witnesses without a dog in this fight,
I agree the court clerk spouse might not have been a big deal, but even if they have strikes - how many were used ? I guess I see anyone related to law enforcement, and especially in that county would seem to unfair. I don't know what goes on in the selection process, but maybe that person even knew what to say or not say to be selected ? Which is why a strike might not have been used.
But , if these 2 individuals were the "strong willed" ones, it kind of supports the argument of those saying it's unfair. We have confirmed that one was indeed one of the strong willed. The other 2 ? Would be interesting to know if it was that husband of a clerk.
Perhaps this has been discussed and I apologize but does anyone know what time on November 3rd Tom & Karen Halbach called police to report her missing? TIA.
Just can't get past Colburn's call to run Teresa's plate number. At the time he made the call, had she been reported missing? That's why I'd like to know what time her folks actually called/went in to make the report and what time Colburn made his call. If she had been reported missing prior to his call, wouldn't all of that information (motor vehicle registration/ltag number for any registered vehicles...) come up when her name was entered into the database?