I'd sure like to have more detail on Mr. Garcia's feelings as it pertains to Missy. Maybe she was going to a new gym, or she was burned out (unlikely). Maybe there were issues she needed to attend to at home. I suspect Mr. Garcia knows more (and has related it to LE) than what we are hearing.This was discussed some following this NG show:
http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/1605/11/ng.01.html
Marc Garcia (gym owner, NG guest) is the one who reported that MB had not been herself lately. NG producers or reporters related that she had not really been to the gym the last two weeks of her life, a gym she went to for 3 years. Here's the thing - if a woman had been going to a gym consistently for 3 years, and even made money there as a personal trainer, and is chummy with the owner, wouldn't she report it if there was a creepy man or woman bothering her? Wouldn't she be very vocal about a stalker, a stranger? The change in MB's participation would seem to have some other source that MB did not wish to discuss with Marc Garcia - as you say dangerous trouble like drug dealing she observed, or crooked LE, or it was something just too personal like the marital and financial problems.
Help!!!!!!!!!!
Is The Inquisitr considered MSM? TIA
Why? IMO they do no good. Anyone who would be evil enough to kill someone certainly would not be guilted by a letter.If I was the family left behind I would be so upset. It seems like a really long time since Missy's loving mom in law wrote her second letter. I hope she writes another one ...... today.
Also, I mentioned after Tricia's first interview if WS had ever been fed the wrong information, intentionally. I didn't get any response. I'm going to throw that question out there again. I'm not saying her sources are aware they are giving the wrong information, but rather that the people feeding her sources information are intentionally not putting the right info out there or they simply aren't "in the know" and very, very few people are actually "in the know" and they aren't divulging a thing to media, colleagues, family, etc. MOO. LE is controlling the dialogue and it is working in their favor, IMO, to have the public runaway with discussion on the wrong (IMO) Swatperp.
Also, I mentioned after Tricia's first interview if WS had ever been fed the wrong information, intentionally. I didn't get any response. I'm going to throw that question out there again. I'm not saying her sources are aware they are giving the wrong information, but rather that the people feeding her sources information are intentionally not putting the right info out there or they simply aren't "in the know" and very, very few people are actually "in the know" and they aren't divulging a thing to media, colleagues, family, etc. MOO. LE is controlling the dialogue and it is working in their favor, IMO, to have the public runaway with discussion on the wrong (IMO) Swatperp.
Help!!!!!!!!!!
Is The Inquisitr considered MSM? TIA
Help!!!!!!!!!!
Is The Inquisitr considered MSM? TIA
Interesting. So then it would NOT make sense for any trainer to kill her just to capture her clients, in order to make money.
Perhaps she does have information that would be considered valuable to the investigation, though- anything about AJ's schedule, his mind-frame around the Austin trip, something that he may have mentioned about MB, etc. So it's not a waste of time to bring her in, but it's also not because they think she can be tied to MB's murder.
I feel very confused and not understanding why it is ok for all of us to know and to name ct by initial in this. Isnt the reason because the owner here has two reporter sources who are locals and who she trusts and ct has not deleted her fbook and that is why it is ok to zoom on her.When I listened to the radio show and then remember what the husband Bevers said I really think they both said that ct has behaved in certain ways or said or done things in addition to her having the same walk as the killer. Why is it not public one bit what else is known about ct, or is that normal for these murder investigations. I have not paid attention to murders for years and it was the video of the killer with those big boots and the wierd helmet that got me and then once I saw the still pic here was it by sparky right, of the killers eyes omy omy I shudder day and night and the image of those eyes in the helmet haunt me contstantly.
Well I am confident LE will solve this case without anyone burning themselves and their innocent children up in a fire. Though I would rather never know then have innocent children harmed.Mountaingazer, I mean I hope that at least they know who did this because wouldnt it be even worse if the killer was completely unknown. Because then it could be like having a ted bundy out loose and we never know where or when he will strike next. If police do not know who the kiiler of Missy is then all of that area should be trembling and shaking and cancel school and church I would think.
I'm curious as to why the radio person is allowed to discuss CT, but we are not here? or am I wrong about that, and if we are allowed to discuss her then why are we not allowed to discuss bevers as suspects? Mainly just curious as I don't really post that much anyway. Thanks in advance!
No, and if you notice in the article they Ref: a MSM article.