Hi all, I am new here. Trying to get caught up but there are a lot of threads on this case! Can someone catch me up on what the father-in-laws alibi is? I will honestly be shocked if it turns out to not be him. I can't watch the footage of him walking with his right foot turned out and think anything otherwise. In my opinion he appears to fit in the height estimates, holds his shoulders low, has same belly... I really wonder if they aren't publicly excluding him to get him to relax and slip up. Without physical evidence it would be very hard to convict on a gait match and nothing else so my thought is they are buying time trying to get something more.
LE stated that the alibis of both RB and BB have been verified by independent sources. I assume this means that they could not have physically been present at the murder scene. But, who knows. LE may be just letting SP out on a long rope while putting hte case together. We do not know. Stay tuned.