Tried doing a rough recon based on the partial postmortem photo. I definitely feel that the other versions by other people are probably more accurate, yet I did want to portray her a little different, although she ended up looking quite a bit younger than I expected.
View attachment 100744
The dismemberment was not haphazard and was performed with a fine, serrated tool. While it was not a surgeon's type cut, an investigator was quoted as saying of the killer "he knew what he was doing".
The newspaper was determined to be six sections of the New York Sunday News, dated September 26, 1976.
Also found in the suitcases were straw and dry packing foam.
There were letters and numbers written in ink (color of ink unknown) on the palm of the left hand of the victim. While there have been different interpretations of what was actually written on the hand, almost definitely was WSR. Next to that was either a 4 or a 5. Below and to the right was either a 4 or 7.
The ink would have probably lasted 8-12 hours on living flesh.
If Beth was not murdered until December, and presumably put into a suitcase at that time, why would the newspaper pieces be from September?
Who keeps newspapers for that long?
I always thought that maybe if the killer was a farm hand he would have quick access to hay. My mother kept old newspapers because we had a coal stove in our house in the kitchen to cook on as well as one for heating in the living room. As far as the packing foam I have no idea unless the killer had recently ordered a gun that was shipped to them. I always pictured the killer as a hunter who was experienced in cutting dear.
http://archive.bangordailynews.com/...rtland-woman-facing-six-year-prison-sentence/Mitchell said Gene Gogan’s head and torso were found first, and eventually 15 of the 17 body parts were found. His thighs were never located. Vella Gogan formerly worked as a butcher’s assistant. Mitchell also testified that although nearly a dozen firearms were taken from the Gogan home, the murder weapon and the butchering utensils have not been found.
If Beth was not murdered until December, and presumably put into a suitcase at that time, why would the newspaper pieces be from September?
Who keeps newspapers for that long? Who keeps dry packing foam and straw handy? What about the fine serrated tool that the perp seemed to use with expertise?
Could the perp work/operate at some kind of gift manufacturing company that delivers orders by mail. Delicate things like art, ceramics, glass, that has to be wrapped in straw, newspaper and packing material?
Since the ink on Beth's hand must have been put there not too long before her death, could the numbers signify the possible date the baby was due to be born, perhaps the 4th, 5th, or 7th of January, and the letters, the initials for a soon to be, but sadly not to be, born baby?
imo, speculation.
http://pennsylvaniamissing.com/bethdoe.html
Several years ago, I was involved in a project that entailed liquidating old stock (household goods, apparel) for a particular retailer. For items deemed unsellable (imperfections, recalls, etc.) we were instructed to put them into the dumpster and spray paint them for no other reason than to prevent dumpster divers from salvaging the stuff and trying to "return" them to the retailer for cash.
I suspect the same is true for the suitcases. Maybe it was the manufacturer that used this method to discard unsellable items, maybe the retailer. Maybe they were taken from a dumpster or from their eventual destination, a landfill aka, as we used to call it back in the day, the local dump. Dumps were a treasure trove for scavengers back then. I can still remember trips to the dump on a Saturday where there would be a line of cars going in to dispose of any manner of unwanted, but not necessarily unusable, household goods and an equal amount of folks picking through the stuff to find usable items to take home. One man's junk is another man's treasure. True today, true back then.
Just curious if there were any published postmortem photos since NamUs lists a recognizable face.
Thanks, Rose and Springrain. I'd seen the censored photo before but hadn't realized it what JD it was.
I'd never seen the uncensored version. I wonder if there was some sort of mark or deformity on her nose that would have helped identify her and that was why it was targeted.