At 3.25am, at the loading bay at the top of Short Brackland, Corrie could have initially walked in three directions.
1. Back the way he came.
2. Down the pedestrianised zone, in front of the shopping centre.
3. Down Short Brackland towards Cannon Street.
As the camera pointing his way is on a "timed sweep" and possibly would only point that way again in another 2 minutes and 48 seconds, it is impossible to conclude which way he went.
If he headed down Short Brackland, he would have which had been pointing that way, completely unseen (as would anybody else that may have been there....including any vehicle(s) that may have been parked there).
But that route would only make sense IF "he was in a habit of walking home" OR "had done so at least one time previously". Yet we are told, he was in a habit of walking home AND he had never ever walked home previously.
In so much as, no other cameras in BSE had any further sight of him (although they are likely on "timed sweeps" so we don't really know which way they are looking or at what time) and no taxi driver has come forward and said they took him to "where ever"....we have to assume (somehow) he went down Short Brackland.
And again, we are back to "was it a habit of his to walk home....after a night out on the beer" !
A simple scenario to this would be.... he is having a pee, someone doesn't like that, that someone gives him a crack, being that drunk he falls over and cracks his skull.
In panic and fearful of the repercussions, they put him in the boot of a car and take him away.
The "pro's" to that are, Corrie is likely having a pee, no one else is there, everything is unseen by the CCTV, a car could be parked at the top of Short Brackland and completely off CCTV. A car could depart unseen by CCTV. And a car could depart prior to the bin lorry entering Short Brackland.
The "Con's" to that are, no one is seen in that area by the CCTV, no one is seen heading to that area by any other CCTV camera in the area. No one has reported a "car regularly parked" in that position.
1. Back the way he came.
2. Down the pedestrianised zone, in front of the shopping centre.
3. Down Short Brackland towards Cannon Street.
As the camera pointing his way is on a "timed sweep" and possibly would only point that way again in another 2 minutes and 48 seconds, it is impossible to conclude which way he went.
If he headed down Short Brackland, he would have which had been pointing that way, completely unseen (as would anybody else that may have been there....including any vehicle(s) that may have been parked there).
But that route would only make sense IF "he was in a habit of walking home" OR "had done so at least one time previously". Yet we are told, he was in a habit of walking home AND he had never ever walked home previously.
In so much as, no other cameras in BSE had any further sight of him (although they are likely on "timed sweeps" so we don't really know which way they are looking or at what time) and no taxi driver has come forward and said they took him to "where ever"....we have to assume (somehow) he went down Short Brackland.
And again, we are back to "was it a habit of his to walk home....after a night out on the beer" !
A simple scenario to this would be.... he is having a pee, someone doesn't like that, that someone gives him a crack, being that drunk he falls over and cracks his skull.
In panic and fearful of the repercussions, they put him in the boot of a car and take him away.
The "pro's" to that are, Corrie is likely having a pee, no one else is there, everything is unseen by the CCTV, a car could be parked at the top of Short Brackland and completely off CCTV. A car could depart unseen by CCTV. And a car could depart prior to the bin lorry entering Short Brackland.
The "Con's" to that are, no one is seen in that area by the CCTV, no one is seen heading to that area by any other CCTV camera in the area. No one has reported a "car regularly parked" in that position.