heidi76
New Member
- Joined
- Dec 26, 2016
- Messages
- 291
- Reaction score
- 2
Thanks, I was curiousThe sister did check in at the high bridge about a week before
Sent from my RCT6303W87DK using Tapatalk
Sent from my SM-S920L using Tapatalk
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Thanks, I was curiousThe sister did check in at the high bridge about a week before
Sent from my RCT6303W87DK using Tapatalk
i dont get it either abbys name isnt on the geo siteI am not getting it?? I don't know who "all four" are??
Im reposting this from the last thread bc i am curious what others think:
Have a question i wanted to ask that i have been thinking about? Do you think the girls were abducted and forced down the hill on the south side of the bridge and forced to cross the creek to where their bodies were found? Or instead do you think they were abducted on the bridge and forced back to the north side and forced down the hill on the north east side of the bridge to where their bodies were found. Did they pass the suspect on the bridge and he followed them back to the north end and forced them down the north east hill and then down to where their bodies were discovered? I ask this bc i know many have speculated that they were forced down the hill on the south side of the bridge and would of had to cross the creek. But I have studied topography and photos and watched youtube videos and those bank along the river look pretty steep to me, i mean getting down to the water would be hard enough. But then you have to factor in that they would of had to climb or be carried up the opposite side bank of the creek in order to be found at their finally restting spot 50' from the creek? ; just my 2 cents <br><br>curious what other sleuthers think?
Also as NIN pointed out : Maybe we are missing something here and they were taken somewhere and brought back and place?
There is one for the bridge room I think it was disabled. Anyone?But the post linked before was to a geocache a few days before. There could have been a new one.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
His username is associated with dozens of groups online too. Jeez.Look at the hider of the geocache. Wish I could say more.
It's a pretty common name.
Sent from my SM-T560NU using Tapatalk
I take it everyone is also noticing any other user names on the page, such as at the top of the page? Just making sure!
His username is associated with dozens of groups online too. Jeez.
Sent from my XT1254 using Tapatalk
Why would a killer put photos of himself up for everyone to see if this was his method in finding victims?. Yet I agree with you. This is very creepy. Now I think I have broken the rules again with commenting on particular people.Geocaching guy is a dead ringer. The nose!!
Because if Geocaching? Or for another reason?....a few days ago I turned in a tip on a person with a name relating to that username. I'm about to freak out.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
You can post the link to the goecache site and state that you find a comment or comments or interesting. Just enough breadcrumb to get people there. But the content of the comments of interest can't be discussed other than people noting they find them of interest.
In other words throw breadcrumbs to get folks there but members cannot make this discussion about whatever is being found interesting there
clear as mud?
I would like to hear from some of the new members regarding their theories with out mentioning any new suspects other than the man on the bridge.....