OT kinda!
Ha you know what just struck me ?
Interesting.When I was reading about how much Grindr is it into masculinity at first it felt different than in my day.
But then it occurred to me - it really was there (the notion of "type" each of us were into).
It was cause it was face to face - so it did not become a "conversation", or something, we were all looking at one another, and yes determining if we found "the guy over there" attractive.
And yes, I was not attracted to, back in our day the term was queeny gay men. Made sense to me! Why would I be attracted to some dude who is effeminate - I like men!
But then I thought in this generations world, the male has become less rugged. The relentless removal of body hair, makeup more accepted, etc etc.
So in truth, a lot of the dynamics of the article are accurate -- it's just that now they must be typed on a cell phone instead of being seen with ones eyes!
If that makes sense?
I found that an interesting revelation!!!
PS: Had no idea the term "masc" was so prevalent!! But, yea. I was cruising for men who looked and acted like men! ONe more notion, that a lot of heterosexual men have is one partner wants to play the "wife" role and the other the "husband" role is a myth - not how it works!!
