Do you have a link to her interview?
the source is the link on this page in post #22, the video interview with her lawyer.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Do you have a link to her interview?
the source is the link on this page in post #22, the video interview with her lawyer.
as i mentioned earlier, you can find several versions of events from supposed witnesses out there, they all contain conflicting information.
also, as i pointed out earlier - this woman does not claim that she was hit by the stroller. so anyone claiming they saw that is mistaken according to the woman herself.
They had a place to stow the stroller and it was the cargo area of the plane.
The airlines have rules about taking a stroller onto a plane. Just because someone is having a melt down doesn't mean they should have their way.
This whole time, I thought she was crying because she was hit with the stroller. So, why was she crying?
there is nothing you can imagine, no set of circumstances, that would make her crying seem reasonable or at least understandable? you seem to have figured out that she is the person more at fault here with very little information to go on.
This whole time, I thought she was crying because she was hit with the stroller. So, why was she crying?
Customer Service 101: The customer is ALWAYS right. The entire incident could have been prevented by the flight crew simply finding a place to stow the woman's stroller. The customer would have been happy, an entire planeload of passengers would have arrived on time, and been happy, and a flight attendant would not have been suspended. It would have been win-win situation for everybody.
"... incident could have been prevented by the flight crew simply finding a place to stow ... stroller" ??? bbm sbm
Respectfully, I believe F/As had already found or would find a space to stow a double stroller: the cargo hold. One post in this thread referred to a double stroller, and one or more posts & MSM said stroller had been tagged as a gate checked-item. IIUC (See post # __ by ___ re airline policies on strollers) stroller, esp a double stroller should have gone into cargo area. Period. *
Does anyone familiar w this plane know of any empty space capable of accommodating a double stroller in a space which would also prevent, during turbulence, the stroller from flying and causing great bodily harm or possibly death to a passenger, not a party to the "customer is always right" concept?
Again, ATM, IDK who was 'right' or 'wrong' in either a legal or moral sense. Just offering thoughts in this wonderful Websleuths site, allowing exchanges of ideas and opinions.
_____________________________________________________________________
* See amazon.com spreadsheet re double stroller weights- these examples 25-40 lbs.
https://www.amazon.com/Baby-Trend-E...&refinements=p_n_feature_browse-bin:668896011
I had a double stroller when my kids were little...it was a double umbrella stroller and very easily could have fit in the overhead compartment. Collapsed it wasn't much bigger than a guitar case. I have no idea what stroller this lady had I'm just answering your question that yes I had a stroller that would easily fit in the overhead compartment.
IMO, the woman was probably told she could "gate check" the stroller and may have misunderstood.
To gate check something you put it at the end of the jet walkway (right before you step onto the plane)
A baggage person will put a little gate check ticket on it and take it outside through a door leading to the cargo hold and stow it where it is readily accessible. When the plane gets to it's destination, the cargo people will immediately bring any gate checked items up and when you step off the plane your checked item will be waiting for you.
If the woman didn't understand the gate check procedure I am not surprised as there are many people in this thread that are unaware.
I'm sure it happens 100's of times each day.