For all the details:
http://www.wctv.tv/content/news/Pro...herine-Magbanuas-attorney-fees-414441673.html
http://www.wctv.tv/content/news/Pro...herine-Magbanuas-attorney-fees-414441673.html
Well, I am not satisfied. What person connected to KM has that kind of money?! COME ON!Conflict of interest inquiry denied. After in camera review Judge is satisifed that there is no conflict.
Well, I am not satisfied. What person connected to KM has that kind of money?! COME ON!
Sent from my SM-J700T using Tapatalk
By: Julie Montanaro | WCTV Eyewitness NewsI wonder the same thing. Was this person or persons checked out? The A's could have given them money to give to her. I certainly hope they checked them out thoroughly.
So I guess the DA' s weren't able to see and hear why the judge ruled as he did? Aren't they the ones who filed the complaint to begin with? How do we know the judge is not under the influence of the A' s or people that know the As. I would think for propriety 's sake, everyone shouldJulie Montanaro WCTV‏Verified account @JulieMontanaroW [video=twitter;888379550060732417]https://twitter.com/JulieMontanaroW/status/888379550060732417[/video]
Katherine Magbanua, defense attorneys, judge meeting behind closed doors to review who is paying her legal bills @WCTV
So I guess the DA' s weren't able to see and hear why the judge ruled as he did? Aren't they the ones who filed the complaint to begin with? How do we know the judge is not under the influence of the A' s or people that know the As. I would think for propriety 's sake, everyone should
have been in the judge's chambers.
Who, in their right mind will put out that kind of dough for someone who so obviously appears to be quilty?! If she knew this person before, why wasn't she living with them or hitting them up for money then?!
How much does anyone suppose today cost the defense? From the time they left Miami to the time they returned to Miami?
No one, and I mean no one is worth that amount of money. And the thing is, whoever it is paying, will never see a cent from KM.
Sorry, this makes no sense to me. If someone would care to explain it to me,
I would be grateful.
This really makes me angry. I want to know.
Sent from my SM-J700T using Tapatalk
Maybe there's a go fund me account established on her behalf that is replenished often from anonymous sources.stranger things have happened, but i trust the Judge. he must have been presented enough "proof" of the source of the funds - fabricated or not. and he had an absence of proof from the State that the alleged masterminds were/are footing the bill. "absence of evidence is not evidence of absence" but the Judge needs evidence. knowing and proving are two different things. in a court of law, we need proof. it does strain credulity to believe that KM's family could afford such a defense and expenses given everything public about them. it is also no coincidence that KM's attorneys are literally "right down the hall" from CA's.
Maybe there's a go fund me account established on her behalf that is replenished often from anonymous sources.
So why was the prosecution not allowed in chambers? I feel they should have had the opportunity to ask questions. Who knows this case better than they do.
It's difficult for me to trust anyone, including a judge, when they do this behind closed doors without the party (prosecution) leveling the charges.
Sent from my SM-J700T using Tapatalk
Well, to add to the horror:
http://abovethelaw.com/2017/07/the-dan-markel-case-wendi-adelson-finds-a-new-job/
Sent from my SM-J700T using Tapatalk
Guess this guy really likes to give people a chance and lend a helping hand to immigrants and he has very deep pockets to do it too! imo.
http://www.miamiherald.com/news/politics-government/article149797499.html
Guess this guy really likes to give people a chance and lend a helping hand to immigrants and he has very deep pockets to do it too! imo.
http://www.miamiherald.com/news/politics-government/article149797499.html
I got on (gently) a poster here who commented on that same article a while back. (And it was opposite of your opinion). So I feel it's only fairp.s. To clarify - I went off topic, not you.
http://www.wctv.tv/content/news/Pro...herine-Magbanuas-attorney-fees-414441673.html
"I don't think it's a setback on trying to prove the link, the conspiracy," prosecutor Georgia Cappleman said after the hearing.
"She was offered immunity, refused it. She's now sitting in jail. I believe she holds the key to her own freedom essentially," Cappleman said, "and it's a little suspicious that she has no money to pay, yet she's hired an expensive legal team that's housed in the same building as Mr. Adelson's attorneys."
http://www.wctv.tv/content/news/Pro...herine-Magbanuas-attorney-fees-414441673.html
"I don't think it's a setback on trying to prove the link, the conspiracy," prosecutor Georgia Cappleman said after the hearing.
"She was offered immunity, refused it. She's now sitting in jail. I believe she holds the key to her own freedom essentially," Cappleman said, "and it's a little suspicious that she has no money to pay, yet she's hired an expensive legal team that's housed in the same building as Mr. Adelson's attorneys."
THIS is what bothers me about the judge in this case. I believe anyone, judges included, can be misguidedhttp://www.wctv.tv/content/news/Pro...herine-Magbanuas-attorney-fees-414441673.html
"I don't think it's a setback on trying to prove the link, the conspiracy," prosecutor Georgia Cappleman said after the hearing.
"She was offered immunity, refused it. She's now sitting in jail. I believe she holds the key to her own freedom essentially," Cappleman said, "and it's a little suspicious that she has no money to pay, yet she's hired an expensive legal team that's housed in the same building as Mr. Adelson's attorneys."