MaryG12
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Nov 22, 2016
- Messages
- 2,207
- Reaction score
- 7,236
I don't think the many bridge engineers involved in this project could have been dumb or unprofessional enough to risk building something that might fall down. They may have been 'pushing the envelope' with some innovative methods and features, but I'm sure they believed it would be safe.
I've been looking at this photo:
It appears as though the bridge deck simply slid down the front of the concrete pier it was resting on, like a book sliding off the edge of a table. Neither it, nor the pier, show signs of cracking or crumbling.
Looking at this photo of the installation(from the other side of that same northern end), the pier appears to have been built angled forward, towards the bridge.
So the physics of the collapse might be that the pier or the soil gave way below ground level, and the pier was pushed into a more vertical position by the pressure from the span, so then it was no longer directly underneath that end of the bridge.
In that case , it could possibly have been something like a miscalculation about how solid the ground was around the foundation of the pier, or how deep they needed it to go.
I'm not a bridge engineer, but that visually jumped out at me.
Wow thank you for those photos - you know, I think you may have the solution as to how and why the bridge collapsed.
And of course I am thinking, had this bridge been done right since its conception - it probably would not have collapsed.