Sorry if I missed something (damn work getting in the way). I thought he was trying to testify?
Apparently he has a letter he wants read into the record after closing. He wants the last word, with no cross examination. Ultimate control.
MI MI - Jessica Heeringa, 25, Norton Shores, 26 April 2013 #9 (J. Willis GUILTY)
- Thread starter imamaze
- Start date
- Status
Apparently he has a letter he wants read into the record after closing. He wants the last word, with no cross examination. Ultimate control.
Perhaps she planned on telling the owner the next day. Many small businesses in small towns like to take care of thiefs internally. Honestly I don't see where your coming from. Your assumptions dont hold water. She's not responsible for Jessica's abduction, Jeffery Willis is.
Sent from my SM-G935V using Tapatalk
Yes, Willis asked some questions of Detective Kasher through his attorney and against his attorney's stated judgement. IMO they were petty and insignificant matters. One of the twitterers tweeted that they thought Kasher was getting riled. I didn't really see signs of anger or fluster. Perhaps Kasher was a little annoyed because the questions were of minimal significance and had already been answered.
Does anybody know who the man is that has been seated between Willis and Johnson for the entire trial? I am curious if he works in the public defender's office or if he has another role, oversight for example? Translation? I would need a buffer between me and JW. uhg.
I think Johnson is a very good attorney and provided the best possible defense in Rebekah's case. Since Willis has attempted to take a more active role in Jessica's case, his defense has deteriorated. Just my opinion, based on watching trials in person and from afar.
Though really, who knows what this jury will think is important. upthread somebody mentioned the Pinellas 12. exactly.
I think Johnson is a very good attorney and provided the best possible defense in Rebekah's case. Since Willis has attempted to take a more active role in Jessica's case, his defense has deteriorated. Just my opinion, based on watching trials in person and from afar.
Though really, who knows what this jury will think is important. upthread somebody mentioned the Pinellas 12. exactly.
- Joined
- Jan 31, 2009
- Messages
- 1,548
- Reaction score
- 2,473
Hey yall - question: What were the blue pills he had in the toolbox? Didnt see that anywhere I prolly missed it
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
IDK, I wondered too....the other man at the defense table was there in the beginning, then wasn't. He has been back the last couple of days, he always sits between Willis and Johnson. I'd say he's the buffer!
JW can't ever claim ineffective counsel. Johnson has done everything JW has wanted...constantly handing him notes and in his ear, nonstop.
Yikes, Johnson just started...it's starting out as the heroin defense.
gregjrichards
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 15, 2010
- Messages
- 12,478
- Reaction score
- 70,433
- Joined
- Jan 31, 2009
- Messages
- 1,548
- Reaction score
- 2,473
And now Im sorry I asked. 🤬 thanks for the reply its appreciated.
-
This blame the victim thing is irritating me - I know hes entitled to a vigorous defense and all, but man, brutal to listen to this garbage
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Actually they do , she didnt report anything . Ordinary citizens that have no affiliation to the business did more then the manager . When youre in the convience store business you know how dangerous it is for one employee and yet after seeing the suspicious vehicle and Not seeing JH she just drove away .
It takes little effort to write down a LP ( if she thought it was a theft
Wouldnt you want to document a suspect vehicle ?) or even make an annymous call to 911?? , people routinely do that too .
. No , shes not responsible for the abduction but could have possibly saved her life and at the least given police a suspect immediately to follow up on . JW is likely to never tell where he put her hes that calous , that we agree on .
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
gregjrichards
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 15, 2010
- Messages
- 12,478
- Reaction score
- 70,433
Loreet, I think that was a letter to the judge from JW.
Thank you! That makes sense. This mystery letter was reported in headlines on WOODTV and maybe another site, but I'm not seeing any summary so it must be either just to the judge/court or not allowed in.
Verdict watch! I would dearly love to see a verdict today but I am guessing tomorrow.
Emma Nicolas
@emmasuenicolas
·
17m
Jurors are back in the courtroom with a question. @wzzm13
Emma Nicolas
@emmasuenicolas
·
17m
Juror wondering if the light was on or off when a person first game to the Exxon station. But judge says he cannot answer this. @wzzm13
@emmasuenicolas
·
17m
Jurors are back in the courtroom with a question. @wzzm13
Emma Nicolas
@emmasuenicolas
·
17m
Juror wondering if the light was on or off when a person first game to the Exxon station. But judge says he cannot answer this. @wzzm13
gregjrichards
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 15, 2010
- Messages
- 12,478
- Reaction score
- 70,433
Heather Walker
@_HeatherWalker
·
7m
We are back in the courtroom waiting on an update from the judge on the #JessicaHeeringa case. #WillisOnTrial
@_HeatherWalker
·
7m
We are back in the courtroom waiting on an update from the judge on the #JessicaHeeringa case. #WillisOnTrial
- Status