How does the location of these white objects seen in photos after the disappearance, relate to the location of other items found, ie the flaperon? I find it so hard to believe that at the time when these items were seen, they were just disregarded due to their thoughts on location; with it being such a huge mystery of worldwide interest - why would they not have just investigated it fully, regardless? Seems so disappointing now to have to go back to something they were aware of so quickly. moo.
"French satellite images first seen in March 2014, a week or so after the plane disappeared, showed white objects in this same area, at 35S.
At the time the objects were dismissed as unimportant.
Other photos had showed similar "blobs" elsewhere in the southern Indian Ocean, many of which were later ruled out as shipping containers, general ocean rubbish or even pods of dolphins.
The French photos were also of poor quality, making it almost impossible to see what the objects were.
But as other evidence began to point further north — the results of the CSIRO drift study and the discovery of more debris linked to the missing plane — investigators suddenly remembered the satellite images.
They asked the French for better copies. And only then did they realise the photos were more significant than first thought.
"When anyone looks at them you think, if they're not bits of plane, what are they? Because for lots of those other objects you can find an explanation, but for these you can't," Dr Griffin said.
The drift analysis included retrospective calculations to gauge where the objects might have been in the hours after MH370 disappeared. And sure enough, it was around 35S, the new zone where Ocean Infinity is preparing to search."