DM transferred properties to his mother for $1 and that is being looked at , because obviously, he did it for a reason and probably to protect his assets from lawsuits. He had quite a few properties worth a lot of money.
Those who showed up took DM's word and the mother that it was suicide. IT is terrible they did that but they did.
I wonder why the Crown wouldn't have bothered to enter into evidence some of the financial info... or is it another case of.. can't count on the 'bookkeeper' to tell the truth on the stand, or produce accurate records from the time, etc.?
Remember when, as per AC's tweets/liveblog, DM asked the officer, when he found the gun, 'was it a revolver'? I wonder why it was not elaborated upon as to what the officer then responded, and how that conversation went? ie.. why do you ask that? what do you know about a revolver? who does the revolver belong to? when did you last see the revolver? have you ever touched the revolver you're referring to? etc etc etc etc etc??????? I am unsure if this was just a lack of reporting every word said during the trial due to only one reporter being sent to cover, or if the detective really did not even respond to DM's strange question?
Unbelievable/incredible, huh? My guess is that, for some reason not really clear right now, DM had the expectation that the MRO would NOT receive its certification. I have wondered about that all along. I know it has been said that this certification was something that was 'coveted', and not easy to get. Is there any reason why this operation would have potentially been declined its certification?Cameron says Millard's second phone was activated on Nov. 1, 2012. That's the day Wayne Millard got the MRO certificate for his business -- and Cameron says that's a business "Dellen Millard didn't want" and that timing was "no coincidence." She says Millard's inheritance money was being "funnelled out" for that business.
by Adam Carter 10:58 AM
Wow...just wow.That screams pre-planning and a motive to me.
Well what were his false statements for Pillay?
How far could a lawsuit against the coroner go, when this part-time, as-needed, semi-retired, at-will coroner, LOST the paperwork on this case? I wonder why he lost the paperwork? I'm saying that it is highly highly unlikely that such paperwork would be lost, and that if any had been lost, what a coincidence that it happened to be THIS particular case that the paperwork was lost.. so my conspiracy-theory-mometer is throwing up red flags to suggest that the coroner didn't want his paperwork analysed in a courtroom.. is it because he's covering an incompetent butt? Or because the notes may have indicated more reason why he believed 'suicide' vs murder? If that were the case however, why not produce it. Okay, so I get it. Is there no procedure written in stone for how coronial paperwork is dealt with as a matter of policy, every single time? This case should really have a coroner's inquest to see why SO much went wrong! I can get it that we're all only human, no matter what our profession is, no matter our career, no matter what the policies are, or precedents, but really? How many things in this particular case are just plain bizarro? jmo.
From memory, I believe the 'accountant' was a man who lived next door to RB. I wonder why he was never called to the stand during ANY trial?
