don't feel that I have been hostile or sarcastic referring to you.K-Mac that's a legitimate question so I'm more than happy to answer. As I said, I'm happy to answer questions about sourcing or information. The reason I didn't say what Tommy was doing at the time of the disappearance is because I wasn't able to establish the answer to that question with professional certainty. If you feel you can, you should absolutely publish an article in an outlet based on your own research.
I might also add that I'm new to this forum. I'm trying to be professional and polite, while you have been sarcastic and hostile since my first post. Is this really how you want to treat new contributors to this important discussion? Particularly those who have researched and are knowledgeable about the case? Many people lurk on WS before posting and this sort of attitude might make others think twice before contributing. I know you're passionate about the case and have good intentions, but it might be something to think about. Most discussions are enriched when numerous voices are able to participate and be heard.
I have thanked you for your time and validated your replies.
told you I thought your article was beautifully written???
there is no hidden agenda with me. I state things black and white.
my last post could be interpreted maybe hostile rereading it but that isn't the intention. sorry for affending you.
journos usually have pretty thick skin!
just frustrated that I am sure you know more and for whatever reasons you inadvertently are keeping the silence going, hope you understand what I am saying.
lets start again.
tamara,
tell us more!!!!
please