Lilibet
Southern Oregon
- Joined
- Apr 13, 2013
- Messages
- 19,411
- Reaction score
- 80,233
Great points. And to those the other day who questioned what Neil_witness had to gain by "coming forward"... well the statement sure did shut people (on here) up for awhile. I didn't read the second post but the first sounded defensive to me. It might be a statement that one might fictionalize if they were trying to cast suspicion away from themselves. All the more reason to honor the process of only trusting those who choose to become verified.
All just my opinion.
What struck me about both statements was the clear animosity toward WS and the theories being floated here. If someone can’t try to convince a group of strangers without being snarky, I’m going to doubt their story. I also was struck by “unnecessary” detail, especially in the first account, which is often seen in false or “embellished” accounts. That being said, some people are prickly and meticulous about detail, so it could mean just that. I’m on another thread where a husband refuses to be verified and it’s like pulling teeth to get consistent and accurate information from him. Refusing to be verified is kind of a red flag regarding credibility even if there is no nefarious motive IMO.