Cottonstar
Case Analyst | Expert in Staged Crimes
AH will move to squash it obviously.TY for the update, CS.
ya UK ? what will AH be able/willing to testify about.
AH will move to squash it obviously.TY for the update, CS.
ya UK ? what will AH be able/willing to testify about.
AH will move to squash it obviously.
what will AH be able/willing to testify about
TY for the update, CS.
ya UK ? what will AH be able/willing to testify about.
Dude, cuz you are the one I am following now.Heyya j
for sure,
def thought of an inappropriate reply....
The Ramseys have finally met their match. They thought they could file this huge lawsuit and get another settlement but CBS & Co went into this with eyes wide open and plenty of legal guidance before they ever even started filming.Alex Hunter has been subpoenaed by CBS.
JonBenet Ramsey case files subject of Boulder court battle in $750M defamation suit
Jonbenét Ramsey's Brother Burke Urges Investigators To Release Hidden Files
JonBenét Ramsey’s Brother Urges Investigators To Release Files That Prove His Innocence
Who killed JonBenét Ramsey? That’s the question that’s plagued authorities and family members for nearly 22 years. Now, the former beauty queen’s brother, Burke Ramsey, is determined to prove his innocence once and for all — by pressuring investigators for key documents.
According to Radar Online, the 31-year-old served CBS with a whopping $750 million defamation lawsuit for the 2016 docuseries The Case of: JonBenét Ramsey, and his team is pushing for the release of more than 60,000 pages of confidential police and FBI records, DNA evidence, and medical examinations gathered during the investigation.
The Ramsey family attorney, L. Lin Wood, insists: “Burke is innocent.”
Burke’s lawyers say key evidence about the contents of JonBenét’s stomach was deliberately left out of the docuseries in order to frame him. The scenario alleged that a then-nine-year-old Burke was furious at JonBenét for stealing pineapple from his bowl, so he smashed her over the head with a flashlight and killed her.
But Burke’s lawsuit claims the pineapple found in JonBenét’s body was in the intestinal tract below her stomach — meaning it had been eaten two to three hours before she died. Additionally, grapes and cherries were found in her system, which the series failed to disclose.
Experts — who testified in the case — said JonBenét would have died within three minutes of a blow to the head, so she wouldn’t have digested the pineapple. In other words, the docuseries’ theory is impossible.
On Christmas day in 1996, JonBenét was discovered sexually molested and strangled to death in the basement of the family’s Boulder, CO home. Although many people have been associated with her murder, the case is still open.
The Boulder District Attorney’s office supported the theory that JonBenét was killed by an intruder, with a broken window in the basement and the gruesome way she was killed (suffocated by a garrote) listed as potential “evidence.”
However, the alleged intruder/murderer has not been found; in 2006, elementary school teacher John Mark Karr falsely confessed to the pageant star’s murder, but DNA samples provided by him did not match the DNA samples found on the child’s body.
In Summer 2016, In Touch revealed that Michael Vail tipped off police about his high school friend Gary Oliva — a pedophile with a strong connection to the case — calling him days after the 1996 murder confessing that he “hurt a little girl.” To this day, though, who truly killed JonBenét remains unsolved.
The cover / lead story of the current National Enquirer is this lawsuit. Worth the read but not verifiable. Both the BPD and DA are trying to prevent CBS's request for access to case files claiming it's an ongoing investigation... more likely they are ashamed
BBM: Its italicised in the Enquirer piece, but bolded here for emaphasis as quoting is italicised.5. The sole item of physical evidence Defendants contend ties Burke to the murder, torture and sexual assault of JonBenet is one of Burke's fingerprints on a bowl of pineapple found in the Ramsey's home.
BBM: as note the system is a general term not as specific as Lower Intestinal Tract, etc, meaning it could have been plucked out of the air.But Burke's lawsuit claims that the pineapple found in JonBenet's body was in her intestinal tract below her stomach - meaning it had been eaten two to three hours before she died.
Whats more grapes and cherries were found in her system, which the docuseries failed to disclose.
Burke's suit also cites experts ...
Hunter still covering it all up.Former Ramsey case DA cites Hawaii trip in bid to avoid defamation case subpoena
con't
"In a reply to the subpoena filed there Friday, Hunter's attorney states "Mr. Hunter is 81 years old, has been retired from the District Attorney's Office for approximately 18 years, and he is a non-party to the underlying action."
It also states that "Mr. Hunter normally spends November to May in Hawai'i and has plans to leave Colorado on November 5, 2018. Any deposition that does not have a strong basis upon which to take place is an undue burden to him, is oppressive, and is an absolute annoyance."
The filing adds that it's "hard to imagine" CBS lawyers don't already have every shred of information they need to defend themselves "without distressing a retired, elderly gentleman about statements that it already possesses."
Attorney Dea Wheeler, on Hunter's behalf, argues that CBS lawyers' interest in Hunter centers on "two public statements" made by Hunter more than 18 years ago. One came in a news release in May 1999, while he was still in office, in which it was noted that then-Boulder Police Chief Mark Beckner had said in a press conference that police were not looking at Burke Ramsey as a suspect, and that "To this day Burke Ramsey is not a suspect."
Secondly, Hunter signed an affidavit in October 2000, shortly before leaving office, which stated in part, "From December 26th, 1996 to the date of this affidavit, no evidence has ever been developed in the investigation to justify elevating Burke Ramsey's status from that of witness to suspect."
Hunter's recent filing argues that any information he might be able to offer now relating either to his 1999 statement or 2000 affidavit "is privileged and confidential because the Boulder Police Department investigation remains open."