I'm sorry abi..I didn't see your reply until just now. We had friends come in right after I had posted.
Anyway... I wasn't referring to the typical home invasion burglaries. I have no doubt they have declined overall although your data is over 2 years old.
With the economy becoming much stronger now I hope it continues to decline overall in total.
Maybe what I should have said was the deadly home invasions have risen when the suspect enters a dwelling that is occupied at the time the home was invaded by either a stranger or strangers.
Imo in many typical burglary cases of 'get in and get out quickly when the home is unoccupied without being seen ' that MO has changed recently for strangers and we are seeing more who hit homes they know are occupied but no longer seem to care.
There have been several such horendous cases that had their own threads right here on WS but the search will reveal there have been even more.
I am away from my computer now but all one has to do is do a simple quick Google search of 'deadly home invasion' not 'home invasion.'
Immediately it will show multiple links from several local news sites depending on which states they happened in.
Some just happened in the past few weeks so these are cases that happened that were not only very recent but those who didnt make national news nor posted on WS.
These are deadly home invasions which resulted in the victims inside ...being injured or murdered.
Bblo.
I wanted to voice my support for what you've posted! It is absolutely true that crimes against people during or connected to the purpose of home invasions have changed drastically.
Sometimes, cash or material goods are not the focus at all, but hurting someone in the home, including so many abductions of adults, do not get reported.
On one hand, as a survivor of an extremely violent attack with some details the public would be " shocked" about-- he was a State Policeman, for example and had worked on a special Sex Crime unit for the entire state for a few years...
But, because the news media at that time, especially, still respected privacy of assault victims, it stayed under the radar except at the higher levels of the state's government.
On the other hand, how can we really KNOW how safe our community is if a rather mixed type of crime doesn't get any coverage because no one died, the person survived and didn't seek publicity in any way, we have strong HIPAA laws for medical privacy?
I'm not sure but am thinking that in the case of an adult being kidnapped for the purpose of assault, HIPAA laws are the reason this is not reported more often.
Before HIPAA, the news media had respect for victims and no news source I know of in the US would have named the victim, if the person survived.
Whew. This ia a very complicated subject with lots of overlapping boundaries. Still, victim's rights and privacy with HIPAA would be my overriding concern if I was the journalist handed a police report which contained mixed elements of both adult to adult abduction or assault in the home after what began as a home invasion.
Criminals used to want money or other valuables in an unoccupied house most of the time. Now, it seems they want to severely hurt or kill as well.
It's like the suburb is a sort of criminal hunting ground that no one really talks about, and many people still don't know
I don't know. I feel like this is such a bizarre situation. I'm having trouble even putting myself in the dad's place to understand. Why was JTP allowed to live alone in the house in Gordon amongst the family's old possessions? Why did the father visit every Saturday? Was he giving JTP money or food? Or did he think JTP had a job? Did JTP pay for anything?
We have too little info right now. MOO.
Respectfully, with what we know about JP's criminality now, what could his father have done with him that was better than an isolated cabin, as far out of harm's way as possible?
If you don't want a potentially dangerous person you may still love and feel responsible for in some ways to be in any stores, you bring what they need to them.
If it gets to the point where you can't take the stress of worrying about " what he might do up there all day every day with nothing but time and his mind ( his sick mind), wouldn't you possibly say " Get a job or your're going to have to leave here? Or, I won't bring groceries and pay the bills for electricity water, etc if you don't come up with employment I can verify in 2 weeks?
I think the jobs he had for one or two days were absolutely forced on him by his father. My rationale for thinking so is based on my knowledge of how, in a large private hospital system in a city, a huge auditorium will hold maybe 500-700 newly hired employees for one to two days of general orientation. They do this for legal reasons.
After the 2 days of sitting there listening to someone reading out of the huge handbooks you are holding, you are assigned to your department head for whatever additional supervised training or observation of competency is needed.
He NEVER EVER made it that far. He just sat in a room with the company's booklets. If that's working, my dog can play Mozart perfectly.